Custom Bats Cricket Forum
General Cricket => Latest Matches => Topic started by: Arthur on February 08, 2009, 01:49:46 PM
-
Right then, after that mess yesterday, how would you change the England XI for the Second Test on Friday? It's obvious it needs to be altered, but will be interesting to see what you think, as well as how it actually turns out.
-
Strauss(c)
Cook
Shah
Pietersen
Bell
Flintoff
Prior
Swann
Broad
Harmison
Sidebottom
-
Strauss
Cook
Shah
Pietersen
Collingwood
Flintoff
Prior
Broad
Anderson
Sidebottom
Panesar
Depending on the wicket replace Anderson with another spinner, maybe Rashid. Monty should be given another go, he bowled pretty well without luck in the 1st test and Swann isn't more talented than Monty.
-
Strauss
Cook
Shah
Pietersen
Collingwood
Prior
Flintoff
Broad
Swann
Anderson
Sidebottom
-
i think shah in at 3
bell at 5
colly at 12
-
how can you justify keeping bell!!!!
-
1) Strauss
2) Cook
3) Shah
4) KP
5) Colly
6) Freddie
7) Prior
8) Broad
9) Sidebottom
10) Harmison
11) Monty
-
bells record shows that he is more succesful down the order
juck him in at 3 hes faced with a ball which is an over old (he panics) and finally gets to 20 but then plays a dumb shot
-
1) Strauss
2) Cook
3) Shah
4) KP
5) Bell
6) Freddie
7) Prior
8) Broad
9) Sidebottom
10) Harmison
11) Swann
-
thats my exact same squad leo
-
Swann at 11.
Bell in the team? Bell can not bat under pressure. Bell is more likely to make 280/3 into 400/4, although Collingwood can do that.
Colly is more likely to make 60/3 into 200/4,and we know for the life of us Bell has never done that.
In my opinion one is so much more valuable to a team than another.
-
thats why bell should be batting at 5
colly has been struggling a bit ;longer than bell even though i thought that bell shouldnt have played in the last test
-
Shah in for Bell
Keep Monty and add another spinner depending on the wicket Rashid/Swann
-
I know Bell and Colly are struggling a bit batting wise and it's a bit of a dilema for which one to be dropped but I've always thought if you drop Collingwood (compared with Bell) you'd be dropping one of, if not, the best fieldsmen in the world. I'm not saying Bell's a bad fielder but Colly's up there with the best
-
Colly should play instead of Bell imo.
-
well the ARG was famous for runs and had been dubbed as the Antigua Record Ground. Unfortunately the match wont be played there but its expected to be a flat track
-
is it me or is bell not as physically fit as he was? seems to have piled the weight on a bit to me!
-
NO Bell for me
-
The conclusion of this game was the most exciting game since the 05 ashes i think.