Custom Bats Cricket Forum

General Cricket => Players => Topic started by: Milky Bar Kid on May 25, 2012, 11:44:59 AM

Title: Nick knight
Post by: Milky Bar Kid on May 25, 2012, 11:44:59 AM
Due to the recent KP incident, anyone got any history on why a lot of pros dislike him? Or is that just my imagination?
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: Nickauger on May 25, 2012, 11:56:58 AM
I would imagine it has something to do with him being massively opinionated, while being distinctly (being kind) average himself.
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: PedalsMcgrew on May 25, 2012, 12:04:27 PM
I think it's more about KP believing he is above criticism! What Knight said about him was perfectly fair....
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: Alvaro on May 25, 2012, 12:06:01 PM
The best thing Nick Knight did was get injured so Trescothick could make his ODI debut
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: Howzat on May 25, 2012, 12:18:46 PM
The best tihng Knight ever did is face the first 100mph ball
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: alba caerulea on May 25, 2012, 12:37:41 PM
There must be some history there because i've never felt Nick Knight oversteps the mark although he is a fairly boring, give me Bumble and Michael Holding any day!

As for him being average, i'm sure he averaged over 40 over quite a few ODIs which is more than Stewart, Trescothick and Strauss. And considerably more than Michael Vaughan!
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: 19reading87 on May 25, 2012, 12:38:07 PM
Personally I was always a huge fan of knights and he was massively under-rated
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: Buzz on May 25, 2012, 12:47:26 PM
The best tihng Knight ever did is face the first 100mph ball
Actually he faced the first two 100mph develeries - unless Thompson and Lillee bowled that fast.

As pointed out be Athers in the times today, it does seem a bit odd/hypercritical that a journalist is allowed to to make a view of a player, but a player isn't allowed to have a view on a pundit...
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: Bulldog Cricket on May 25, 2012, 12:56:09 PM
Think he is 4th in the England odi averages so knows how to bat. I would think Kp should concentrate on scoring runs against one of the weakest attacks in world cricket.
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: will5210 on May 25, 2012, 01:11:19 PM
Think he is 4th in the England odi averages so knows how to bat. I would think Kp should concentrate on scoring runs against one of the weakest attacks in world cricket.

I agree. KP seems to have no idea how to avoid attracting problems for himself!
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: Number4 on May 25, 2012, 01:20:45 PM
Actually he faced the first two 100mph develeries - unless Thompson and Lillee bowled that fast.

As pointed out be Athers in the times today, it does seem a bit odd/hypercritical that a journalist is allowed to to make a view of a player, but a player isn't allowed to have a view on a pundit...

The way you poms handled them you would swear Lillee and Thompson bowled hand grenades Buzz...  ;) of course they bowled that fast  8)
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: RossViper on May 25, 2012, 01:39:44 PM
Nick Knight decent batter, woeful commentator, as are some many of the sky pundits - cant understand why sky don't get rid of them, there must be better, must be...


Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: Stewie-Kidd on May 25, 2012, 04:20:48 PM
Excuse my ignorance but what was the recent incident with KP?
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: 19reading87 on May 25, 2012, 05:25:00 PM
I just wana say people are having a dig at Nick knight , what about Ian Ward??
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: RossViper on May 26, 2012, 09:22:40 AM
I just wana say people are having a dig at Nick knight , what about Ian Ward??

yes, ward is rubbish too, there are a few hopless ones on Sky, I'm really not sure why, there must be better out there...
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: brownie266 on May 26, 2012, 09:43:25 AM
I heard on Channel 5 Cricket that KP had a fine of £3000. What do we think of that??
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: PM7 on May 26, 2012, 07:45:18 PM
I bet Nick Knight was more popular than KP in the dressing room as a player.
As talented as KP is he is incredibly full of himself and certainly feels he is above the law.
Knight doesnt offer much as a commentator but there are worse out there on Sky.
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: gabbers on May 26, 2012, 07:56:57 PM
yes, ward is rubbish too, there are a few hopless ones on Sky, I'm really not sure why, there must be better out there...
The only time I ever listen to the commentary and not tms instead or test match sofa is if bumble or holding are On. The rest are cack.
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: gabbers on May 26, 2012, 07:57:38 PM
Or Nasser
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: Tail Ender on May 28, 2012, 01:49:14 AM
Interesting to read the different views on the Sky pundits. We get the Sky telecast here in Australia when England play and I actually enjoy the different voices. Holding and Bumble are my favourites too, but I think Atherton is one of the most insightful and articulate commentators around; enjoy the banter between Botham and Nasser; don't mind Gower either. It sure beats the likes of Ian Healy, Mark Taylor and Michael Slater. Good players though they were, they're awful commentators.
Title: Re: Nick knight
Post by: PM7 on May 28, 2012, 06:39:44 AM
Agreed, apart from the class act Benaud the Aussie commentators are predictable and the ramblings monotonous. I do enjoy Warne on SKY sports and Tony Greig on Channel 9.
Danny Morrison I cant handle and he makes the IPL painful watching....or perhaps listening.