Custom Bats Cricket Forum

Equipment => Your Kit => Topic started by: countycricketplayer on March 26, 2013, 12:12:49 PM

Title: Woodstock Kit
Post by: countycricketplayer on March 26, 2013, 12:12:49 PM
So the day started at 7.45, it was a long journey but made longer because of the snow, we should of arrived at 10.15 but arrived at 2, we were greated by John about 10 minutes from his house, he then drove us to his house, there was tea and biscuits  waiting there for us, we then had a chat about Cricket in general, then it was off to the workshop, i had already emailed him my requirments so there was a bat already made for me , but took and Oz off in the end , there was some Raw clefts and some part mades there, i then went to pick out gloves pads bag and thigh guards.
Bat Specs
2'10
40mm edges
60mm spine
minimal concaving
Pings amazingly well
 (http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s382/ccp6/001.jpg)
(http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s382/ccp6/002.jpg)
(http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s382/ccp6/003.jpg)

Gloves:
Pittard Parms
great protection
comfortable
(http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s382/ccp6/007-1.jpg)

Pads:
7 piece cane
superb level of protection
comfy straps
small top flap
(http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s382/ccp6/008-1.jpg)

Bag:
spacious
strong zips
durable material
lots of pockets on the side

(http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s382/ccp6/004.jpg)

Also the soft pockets from wilike real top quality, no damages to any of bats sinced i started using them.
(http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s382/ccp6/011-1.jpg)
(http://i1049.photobucket.com/albums/s382/ccp6/012-1.jpg)

Overall a great day, apart the long drive there, i would highly reccomend to anyone great set up and nice guy. i would like to thank John and his Wife for there hospitality.
James
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: justnotcricket86 on March 26, 2013, 12:52:01 PM
Good looking gear mate.

Was there much bat making equipment there when you visited? I'm local so should really go over and see what's what.
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: Red Ink Cricket on March 26, 2013, 01:09:57 PM
Bat looks good, i thought you said you had seen him make your bat in the previous thread?

soft goods are of a good standard. a friend of mine had his kit at the start of the season. pads did look on the small side though for mens size. the bat was a rocket tho, it also imploded like one too. cracked straight across the splice on the back. was informed that it had been mistreated and that it wasnt a warranty fault so wouldnt be replaced. it was about 2 months old if that as it had originally been changed as the first one was a complete plank and broke quickly too. having dealt with john myself(fobbed off and poor excuses) and also my friends experience i can safely say i wouldnt use them again. thats just my experience though. as others have said they are more than happy with the product/service.
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: countycricketplayer on March 26, 2013, 02:18:00 PM
Bat looks good, i thought you said you had seen him make your bat in the previous thread?

soft goods are of a good standard. a friend of mine had his kit at the start of the season. pads did look on the small side though for mens size. the bat was a rocket tho, it also imploded like one too. cracked straight across the splice on the back. was informed that it had been mistreated and that it wasnt a warranty fault so wouldnt be replaced. it was about 2 months old if that as it had originally been changed as the first one was a complete plank and broke quickly too. having dealt with john myself(fobbed off and poor excuses) and also my friends experience i can safely say i wouldnt use them again. thats just my experience though. as others have said they are more than happy with the product/service.
i was going to two but in end decided in the one that he already made
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: countycricketplayer on March 26, 2013, 02:18:34 PM
Good looking gear mate.

Was there much bat making equipment there when you visited? I'm local so should really go over and see what's what.
Yeah there was everything apart from a press
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: toenails97 on March 26, 2013, 02:54:59 PM
Love the look of the pads mate
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: grb on March 26, 2013, 06:24:31 PM
Great looking gear. Love the classic branding, 'big' brands should take note in my opinion!
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: The_Bird on March 26, 2013, 06:28:05 PM
Minimal concaving?
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: IQ on March 26, 2013, 08:54:01 PM
Bat looks good, i thought you said you had seen him make your bat in the previous thread?

soft goods are of a good standard. a friend of mine had his kit at the start of the season. pads did look on the small side though for mens size. the bat was a rocket tho, it also imploded like one too. cracked straight across the splice on the back. was informed that it had been mistreated and that it wasnt a warranty fault so wouldnt be replaced. it was about 2 months old if that as it had originally been changed as the first one was a complete plank and broke quickly too. having dealt with john myself(fobbed off and poor excuses) and also my friends experience i can safely say i wouldnt use them again. thats just my experience though. as others have said they are more than happy with the product/service.

That's sad.

With the prices they are charging, they better fix their warranty policy.

Also, crack down the splice is more of an incorrectly fitted handle thing, isn't it? How can they claim that to be mistreatment?

Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: Red Ink Cricket on March 26, 2013, 09:03:36 PM
It was across the bottom of the splice and then went up towards the shoulder and down an inc or so. He now uses kook gear!
Title: Re: Woodstock Kit
Post by: yogi206 on April 02, 2013, 12:47:05 PM
That's sad.

With the prices they are charging, they better fix their warranty policy.

Also, crack down the splice is more of an incorrectly fitted handle thing, isn't it? How can they claim that to be mistreatment?

splice cracks happen when the handle isnt fitted correctly a pure manufacturing fault