Custom Bats Cricket Forum

Equipment => Bats => Topic started by: procricket on October 23, 2016, 08:21:03 PM

Title: Bat Size article
Post by: procricket on October 23, 2016, 08:21:03 PM
Well I'm trying to find out who makes what and came across this


http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/cricket-world-cup-2015/take-away-edge-from-willow-and-you-will-take-away-thrill-too/41981.html (http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/cricket-world-cup-2015/take-away-edge-from-willow-and-you-will-take-away-thrill-too/41981.html)





Nothing new but I found interesting and it happening
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: bk on October 23, 2016, 09:44:20 PM

Great quote on why we should support equipment innovation. Cricket shoots itself in the foot too often.
[/size][/color][/size]"Tennis, golf and other sports don't impose many restrictions on equipment and as a result these sports have grown globally at a much faster speed than cricket." [/color]





Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on October 24, 2016, 08:33:14 AM
Great quote on why we should support equipment innovation. Cricket shoots itself in the foot too often.

"Tennis, golf and other sports don't impose many restrictions on equipment and as a result these sports have grown globally at a much faster speed than cricket."

That's better!  ;)
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: Seniorplayer on October 24, 2016, 09:36:22 AM
Confirmed what most on here already knew
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: springbok45 on October 24, 2016, 10:07:05 AM
That's better!  ;)

Thanks, haven't read the article (yet) but golf took to regulating clubs and balls quite seriously in the early 2000s , things like CoR, groove shape/angles/depth, club head size, ball reaction, to prevent the courses that make up so much of the history of the game from becoming pitch and putts for the pros, maybe the icc should spend some time with the R&A and USPGA to see what they can do for the balance of the game.
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: Wickets-then-runs on October 24, 2016, 11:25:25 AM
The game can be balanced out (and is quite often in club cricket) by providing pitches with a bit more in it for the bowlers! Some of the most exciting Test matches i have watched have been where the green top has assisted a bowler. That or, in Test cricket, allow for a new ball at 60 overs instead of 80. If the ball is reversing, the fielding captain doesnt have to take the new pill....
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: springbok45 on October 24, 2016, 12:10:43 PM
Thanks, haven't read the article (yet) but golf took to regulating clubs and balls quite seriously in the early 2000s , things like CoR, groove shape/angles/depth, club head size, ball reaction, to prevent the courses that make up so much of the history of the game from becoming pitch and putts for the pros, maybe the icc should spend some time with the R&A and USPGA to see what they can do for the balance of the game.

Having now managed to read the article I don't have much faith in the writers claims as he was stating concaving is used for aerodynamic reasons ;)
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: Bats_Entertainment on October 24, 2016, 12:13:29 PM
The game can be balanced out (and is quite often in club cricket) by providing pitches with a bit more in it for the bowlers!

By accident, rather than by design, in club cricket, I think.
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: procricket on October 24, 2016, 12:36:06 PM
Confirmed what most on here already knew

No as stated but find it interesting players weight and some marketing speak thrown in.

He joins the long list of makers for the stars
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: jamferg on October 24, 2016, 01:10:23 PM
so assuming he was making bats from 2001-13 for ST then ST must have been 'playing away' behind his back with other makers! As he is known to have bats made by BAS is the articles writer former  head bat maker at BAS?
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: Bats_Entertainment on October 24, 2016, 11:19:08 PM
so assuming he was making bats from 2001-13 for ST then ST must have been 'playing away' behind his back with other makers! As he is known to have bats made by BAS is the articles writer former  head bat maker at BAS?

Wasn't ST also said to have sworn by TK/ Newbery bats?
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: shax12 on October 25, 2016, 01:28:40 AM
so assuming he was making bats from 2001-13 for ST then ST must have been 'playing away' behind his back with other makers! As he is known to have bats made by BAS is the articles writer former  head bat maker at BAS?

This writer is not bat maker for BAS but has his own brand. He has supplied many international player bats in the past but not much in recent times. I saw Mashrafe Mortaza in the ODI series use his bat which is Matrixx.
Any one on here from India who can tell us more about this bat maker or who have used Matrixx bats.

Also Indian batsmen get bats from nearly every bat maker to see how good they are and just put their sponsor stickers on them if they like them. Kohli has had bats made by BDM, SG, RNS, BAS and SS.
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: procricket on October 25, 2016, 06:40:38 AM
Come on let's be honest they get from everywhere Kohli has used in the past GM and also ca.
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: FattusCattus on October 25, 2016, 07:45:11 AM
Haha Matrixx!!!!  He had a reputation for sidling up to players in the nets and handing them one of his bats to ask their opinion of it - then one of his mates who was hid in the bushes took a picture of said player in his training gear holding the bat. Lo and behold, it would appear on his website with the caption Tendulkar / Dhoni / Kholi / whoever......which bat do they use aha? :)

His website was always interesting to look at.
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: WalkingWicket37 on October 25, 2016, 08:05:00 AM
Matrixx are back with some link to Impala now I beleive

As for the bats themselves, I loved my £30 so much I sold it on after 3 nets! The horrendous stickers were a bit of fund, but it was no Pingbat in terms of response....
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: sachin200 on November 17, 2016, 04:09:27 AM
Really? I didn't know that Matrixx had such a bad name.
By the way, I am not sure if just edges are making the difference. I think today's willow-wielders are way too stronger to their predecessors. Increase bat weights and speeds and no fear attitude is bound to send the balls sailing in the crowd. Just over the past decade since T20 came into picture, no one is talking about hitting the ball along the ground anymore. In old days you used to have only a few dominating batters who batted with lesser caution and the world loved them. 4/5 runs an over in an ODI was supposed to be really-really great! Every team had atleast a couple of fearsome bowlers. Now that fear has disappeared!

I just hope that we don't see any serious injury to a bowler because of being hit by the ball since 1. they are in the firing line and closest (even closer than the umpires) to the batter 2. they are generally off balance and not ready when it most often comes back.
Title: Re: Bat Size article
Post by: tim2000s on November 18, 2016, 09:23:10 AM
In the early 00s one of my mates became the UK distributor for Matrixx. Some of the bats were pretty good and I bought one. Mine wasn't one of the good ones but I was able to offload it to an unsuspecting team mate. He really struggled to sell them....