Custom Bats Cricket Forum

General Cricket => Players => Topic started by: stevie on September 07, 2008, 08:26:26 PM

Title: Michael Clarke
Post by: stevie on September 07, 2008, 08:26:26 PM
How good a captain has he been in the recent odi series against Bangladesh? Also how has his batting been?  Am i right in thinking that he is just standing in for Ponting at the moment?
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Outlaw on September 07, 2008, 08:58:26 PM
His leadership skills have been impressive, batting wise below par 40 @ 13.33
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Tikolo on September 08, 2008, 12:01:44 PM
Hes got a good cricket brain though, plus who else is going to do the job. I mean you can;t expect someone like Michael Hussey or Symo to do the job because he is just about the same age as Punter, so thats not looking towards the future. Pups been in the team long enough and his place in the team in all forms of the game is pretty secure, so i guess hes the only player with the right credentials to fill in for Ponting and take over when Punter retires.
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: stevie on September 08, 2008, 05:35:40 PM
Not a good sign with his batting though. Hopefully it's just a blip as when he's batting well he is one of my favourite batsmen to watch. Personally i would like him to be captain after Punter as i as well can't see who else would get the job.
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Sambo on September 09, 2008, 06:46:07 AM
Brett lee, but his time in the game is in question. I think it could be pre season rust (well im hoping anyway). yet on saying that id like to congratulate the bangers on their bowling performance. i think they try to bowl like other teasm, but they dont have the speed to. if they bowl like that more often i can see some major upsets in their favour soon
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Tikolo on September 09, 2008, 08:54:14 AM
Yeah but you don't really see many Bowlers being captains though i dunno why, i can only think of Daneil Vettori in international cricket. why though?
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: stevie on September 09, 2008, 10:03:48 AM
I think the idea is that they have enough to worry about with their bowling, Pollock did it but not very well.
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Tikolo on September 09, 2008, 11:52:34 AM
Yeah but they are able to step up and bowl at the death for their team, take wickets at crucial moments in a game
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: stevie on September 09, 2008, 12:24:18 PM
Shouldn't they be able to do that anyway if there international bowler's?
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Sambo on September 12, 2008, 09:16:46 AM
against top class batters, thats not always possible
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: stevie on September 12, 2008, 06:14:04 PM
What i'm saying is that international bowler's should always be playing at 100% and that they shouldn't need to raise their game just because their captain the same way a batsmen shouldn't. I understand that they would like to lead by example.
Sambo your saying that raising your  game isn't possible against harder oppisition as that for me is when you would want to be trying harder anyway.
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Class act on September 14, 2008, 07:20:56 AM
Nobody could bat on those terrible Darwin pitches, he will be a great captain when ricky retires.
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Howzat on September 14, 2008, 08:27:19 AM
I agree with class act one day he will make a good captain, but will he be able to cope with the pressure?
Title: Re: Michael Clarke
Post by: Sambo on September 14, 2008, 10:25:43 AM
mate i meant that sometimes things dont work out and you get tonked. It's a fact of cricket. Everybody has off days. And no it is possible to raise your game for harder opposition, look at the bangladeshi bowlers in the 3rd ODI. I wasn't inferring that at all.