Custom Bats Cricket Forum

General Cricket => Latest Matches => Topic started by: iand123 on September 23, 2010, 01:33:26 PM

Title: Ashes squad
Post by: iand123 on September 23, 2010, 01:33:26 PM
From Aggers twitter account...

strauss cook trott kp colly bell morgan prior davies swann monty broad, anderson finn tremlett bresnan
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Liam-SCCC on September 23, 2010, 01:37:40 PM
Good squad.

A good performance squad as well to use as cover. Hildreth and Kieswetter in that.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Tumo on September 23, 2010, 01:37:52 PM
Why Monty?! Argh. Can't argue with the rest of the squad though. Definitely got the rest right. Would have preferred Rashid though!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: kenbriooo on September 23, 2010, 01:40:00 PM
would prefer yardy to monty!!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: 400notout on September 23, 2010, 01:41:40 PM
Rashid not in either squad, surely he will be feeling pretty hard done by. Bopara is playing First Class cricket somewhere or other, would have thought he would have made himself available for either squad, bit selfish imo
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: mdl_1979 on September 23, 2010, 01:42:19 PM
Disappointed that Shahzad and Rashid have missed out to two guys that have been playing Div 2 cricket.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Liam-SCCC on September 23, 2010, 01:43:05 PM
Yardy would provide more batting than monty when playing 2 spinners
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: 100 not out on September 23, 2010, 01:43:31 PM
Is Bresnan an international quality bowler??

Wheres the reverse swinger??

Broad, Finn and Tremlett too similar for me.

Adil Rashid where is he???
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Colesy on September 23, 2010, 01:44:19 PM
would prefer yardy to monty!!
Yardy averages something ridiculous in Championship cricket

Tremlett's not a bad shout, been bowling well this year and he may suit Aussie conditions.

Bresnan - No
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: 100 not out on September 23, 2010, 01:44:44 PM
Is Yardy going to take wickets in the 5 day game bowling his darts. . . come on
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Liam-SCCC on September 23, 2010, 01:46:40 PM
fair enough.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: eaowbear on September 23, 2010, 01:47:29 PM
Panesar took over 50 wickets this summer and is a proper Test match bowler unlike Yardy
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: ianbuchanan on September 23, 2010, 01:49:17 PM
Yeah im happy with Monty, has a good test record to be fair. And he did well in Australia last time round.... but I doubt England will play 2 spinners the only way he will get a game is if Swann is injured.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Liam-SCCC on September 23, 2010, 01:50:25 PM
whats davies championship batting like? Is he the best possible reserve keeper?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Liam-SCCC on September 23, 2010, 01:51:10 PM
Yeah im happy with Monty, has a good test record to be fair. And he did well in Australia last time round.... but I doubt England will play 2 spinners the only way he will get a game is if Swann is injured.

I remember someone saying that there may be 1 test where 2 spinners are required.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Colesy on September 23, 2010, 01:52:40 PM
SCG?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: 100 not out on September 23, 2010, 01:54:11 PM
Lets face it. . .that bowling attack is hardly going to give Ponting sleepless nights.

There are only 2 real qulaity bowlers there for me JA and GS and maybe SB.

God knows what they see in Bresnan??

Who has he played against. . . Bangladesh and a lack lustre Pakistan.

Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Beachcricket on September 23, 2010, 01:55:44 PM
I feel so sorry for Rashid, he has had a solid season and leg spinners are worth their weight in gold. To not even get a performance squad place must hurt.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: eaowbear on September 23, 2010, 01:58:46 PM
From what I have read people rate Davies as good enough to play Test cricket on his batting alone let alone being a keeper. At the Rose Bowl yesterday you didn't notice his keeping which I think is a very good thing as was very tidy indeed.

They have obviously lost faith in Rashid for whatever reason but surely he had to go in the Performance squad?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Tumo on September 23, 2010, 01:59:17 PM
I feel so sorry for Rashid, he has had a solid season and leg spinners are worth their weight in gold. To not even get a performance squad place must hurt.
And again, agreed completely! He also bats a damn sight better than Monty, has more variation, and is a strong fielder!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: eaowbear on September 23, 2010, 02:02:52 PM
But from a selectors point of view they must think Panesar has more control than Rashid who the Aussies could get after?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Colesy on September 23, 2010, 02:05:12 PM
Monty has had experience in test matches and an Ashes series. Rashid should've gone in the development squad
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Tumo on September 23, 2010, 02:05:36 PM
But he doesn't even have that much control! If you attack Monty he goes to pieces! When his stock delivery isn't working for him he has nowhere else to go! Rashid has more variation, which could prove helpful if the Aussies try to attack him.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Beachcricket on September 23, 2010, 02:07:34 PM
I like the look of Davies more than Kieswetter but that's just my opinion.

Keepers are also worth their weight in gold, to me you have to be a brilliant keeper first then batting is a bonus which is why Chris Read (amongst others) would be my pick.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Liam-SCCC on September 23, 2010, 02:13:59 PM
SCG?

Yes, 2 spinners in the Sydney test
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: iand123 on September 23, 2010, 02:16:22 PM
Eoin Morgan has only got an incremental contract. As there are 11 players who have full central contracts, are they only permitted to name 11 central contracts?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: mdl_1979 on September 23, 2010, 02:37:42 PM
If Morgan keeps playing all formats he will automatically trigger a full central contract before too long - that is the way it works these days.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: johnnyw on September 23, 2010, 03:11:41 PM
I know most people are disappointed Rashid is not in the squad but an ashes series is not one for a player without test experience. He would only be targeted and taken to pieces by the Aussies. Just look at Mcgain last year 
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: iand123 on September 23, 2010, 03:17:35 PM
If Morgan keeps playing all formats he will automatically trigger a full central contract before too long - that is the way it works these days.

I know that, but i figured he'd have played enough games this year to be given a full contract staright away. I guess it shows that they still see him as not part of the full test XI for the immediate future
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 23, 2010, 03:19:43 PM
Ajmal Shahzad should have been selected ahead of Tremlett or Bresan. Tough luck for the lad. Nevertheless, not a bad squad.

Middle order looks good if these play;

Trott, KP, Bell and Morgan.

Bowling looks fine as well. I would have preferred a swing bowler (Shehzad).
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: eaowbear on September 23, 2010, 03:30:54 PM
Looking at it why on earth is Buttler not in the performance squad? Why would they go for Bairstow ahead of him?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: mars on September 23, 2010, 04:18:06 PM
Shahzad should be in the main quad for me. He has deserved a place in the team and has the skill of reverse swinging the ball.

I have no idea why the selectors have left out Adil Rashid from both squads. I would pick him any day over Panesar, Briggs and Tredwell.

Adil Rashid with Yorkshire brought 732 runs at 45.75 alongside 57 wickets at 31.29.
Danny Briggs for Hampshire: 32 wickets at 39.43 (19 fair enough)
Tredwell: 37 wickets at 29.67 (he's is 28)

Adil Rashid is 22 and has already got 228 first class wicket and the most shocking this is that he has only played 5 ODI's and 5 T20I. Now what's going on here?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: essexarsenal on September 23, 2010, 04:24:08 PM
tredwell is better than monty in my eyes and can bat a bit along with rashid, why temletts ahead of shahzad i dont know but tremlett will be back up so all good, whers buttler in the performance squad and great to see chambers in performance team, he had real good season for us and was unlucky with the injuries!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Cover_Drive on September 23, 2010, 04:31:59 PM
I remember Younus Khan who has played along Adil Rashid was always in full praise of him. SO yes I also believe he deserve a selection ahead of Monty Panasar who has done absolutely nothing lately.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Richard on September 23, 2010, 04:33:40 PM
I think the squad is pretty much spot on, with a few talking points.

Bresnan is poor but there is no-one else glaringly obvious in the seamers department who should have his place.

I can see why they've plumped for Monty but i reckon Rashid can feel very hard done too. In truth id rather have Ian Blackwell in the squad ahead of Tredwell or Yardy.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Buzz on September 23, 2010, 04:46:32 PM
I agree - Blackwell must have upset someone somewhere
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: niceonechoppy on September 23, 2010, 04:57:03 PM
Shazhad is very unlucky, Bresnan is not international class (and Im a Yorkshireman!). Fair enough to Monty, I hope he does well as he has worked hard on his bowling and got decent rewards.....
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Outlaw on September 23, 2010, 05:18:52 PM
Blacky is class however he doesn't fit in with the fitness regime likes his guiness too much!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: essexarsenal on September 23, 2010, 05:29:28 PM
here's a question for you,   if samit patel was "fit" would he be in that ashes squad ??
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Beachcricket on September 23, 2010, 05:39:42 PM
I've been reliably informed that, that individual may or may not be a bit full of himself and as a result has or has not been known to rub people up the wrong way.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Buzz on September 23, 2010, 05:41:33 PM
Shazhad isn't unlucky, he isn't good enough yet. He bowled well in one game for England, has fielded shockingly and isn't ready. He has been bigged up by Michael Vaughan and his management, I am not sure he is mentally strong enough either.

Samit Patel is an Idiot. He choice was to eat curry now and be a "I couldabeen" or be an international cricketer for 5 years make masses of cash in the indian premier league and then eat curry after beeing a star.

He chose to eat curry now.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Jeet on September 23, 2010, 05:45:35 PM
Shazhad isn't unlucky, he isn't good enough yet. He bowled well in one game for England, has fielded shockingly and isn't ready. He has been bigged up by Michael Vaughan and his management, I am not sure he is mentally strong enough either.

Samit Patel is an Idiot. He choice was to eat curry now and be a "I couldabeen" or be an international cricketer for 5 years make masses of cash in the indian premier league and then eat curry after beeing a star.

He chose to eat curry now.
Curry the stable food of Indian people?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Buzz on September 23, 2010, 05:56:31 PM
Jeet - no the indian take away version with extra cream and saturated fats - not the healthy food of the indian people.

Sorry if I caused offence - it is my utter frustration when a seriously talented player can't be bothered to be as good as he can be. Look at how freddie turned it around - it is possible. I am not saying Samit is as talented as Freddie - but the right attitude goes a long way in cricket - just ask Andrew Strauss or Paul Collingwood - not the most talented players in the world but two massively hard working ones.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: espocrespo on September 23, 2010, 06:38:47 PM
cant believe they picked panesar over rashid
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Outlaw on September 23, 2010, 07:00:44 PM
Samit is a shame, very talented cricketer just loves the food! Once saw him sneaking into a chip shop with hoody on his head to try and disguise it was him! His younger brother is a quality player though and has a different body shape!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Jeet on September 23, 2010, 07:06:39 PM
Jeet - no the indian take away version with extra cream and saturated fats - not the healthy food of the indian people.

Sorry if I caused offence - it is my utter frustration when a seriously talented player can't be bothered to be as good as he can be. Look at how freddie turned it around - it is possible. I am not saying Samit is as talented as Freddie - but the right attitude goes a long way in cricket - just ask Andrew Strauss or Paul Collingwood - not the most talented players in the world but two massively hard working ones.
My mistake mate, didn't realise that Samit is a takeaway guy.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Jeet on September 23, 2010, 07:07:22 PM
cant believe they picked panesar over rashid
Why not??

Monty has 100+ Test wickets and has taken a 5 wicket haul in Australian conditions
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: ianbuchanan on September 23, 2010, 07:09:01 PM
After serious and in-depth discussion with the resident Aussie man who works at my local Esso station, he assures me that England will need 2 spinners at the SCG!!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Beachcricket on September 23, 2010, 07:10:27 PM
Anyone who fails a fitness test when they are a professional sportsman and they don't have a reasonable excuse i.e. injury or sickness, should be ashamed of themselves. That should have been an eye opener for him.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: ProWannabe88 on September 23, 2010, 07:10:53 PM
Hasn't the scg been a good hunting ground for spinners over the past 15 years or so?? Two spinners would probably be nailed on.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Jeet on September 23, 2010, 07:11:06 PM
After serious and in-depth discussion with the resident Aussie man who works at my local Esso station, he assures me that England will need 2 spinners at the SCG!!
I wouldn't believe him.

Pak didn't play 2 spinners earlier this year at the SCG.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Buzz on September 23, 2010, 07:28:29 PM
Given the aussies don't have a decent spiner I think it is unlikely they will prepare a bunson for swann, the best bowler on either side.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Jeet on September 23, 2010, 07:32:31 PM
Given the aussies don't have a decent spiner I think it is unlikely they will prepare a bunson for swann, the best bowler on either side.
Hauritz is very under rated Buzz. I think he'll go well in India
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: roco on September 23, 2010, 08:03:25 PM
Hauritz comes across as a very defensive spinner where as swann is very attacking
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: niceonechoppy on September 23, 2010, 08:06:53 PM
Hauritz is very under rated Buzz. I think he'll go well in India
Agreed, high quality spinner, and not utilised enough by Ponting IMO.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: johnnyw on September 23, 2010, 08:14:15 PM
I think Hauritz and Swann are similar... just used differently used by their captains
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Alvaro on September 23, 2010, 08:17:17 PM
a lot was made about hauritz bowling more attacking lines in oz last winter, when he started to take five-fors and give it a rip...
i still find it amazing that he can have success at international level yet was not being picked by his state prior to his call-up.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Howzat on September 23, 2010, 08:17:21 PM
I wouldn't believe him.

Pak didn't play 2 spinners earlier this year at the SCG.
The second spinner could not be convinced to throw the game wheres a pace bowler was!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: roco on September 23, 2010, 08:18:33 PM
Could not disagree more swann turns it slot more than hauritz and just seems more attacking but the last one may be down to how the captain uses them as ponting does nit seem to trust his spinner where as Strauss would put it all on the line with swann
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Alvaro on September 23, 2010, 08:27:55 PM
Could not disagree more swann turns it slot more than hauritz and just seems more attacking but the last one may be down to how the captain uses them as ponting does nit seem to trust his spinner where as Strauss would put it all on the line with swann

doing some reading about hauritz and watching highlights, he is assuming a more attacking role.
http://www.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/474278.html is just a taster. I'm not saying he is going to run through England, but he isn't that bad a bowler at all, and Ponting has been trusting him more.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: roco on September 23, 2010, 08:32:03 PM
Well we will see as I can only comment on what I have seen but think it will be a very tight series 2-1 england
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Wills on September 23, 2010, 08:39:01 PM
a bit off-topic,
but why was jos buttler NOT included in the performance squad?
whereas danny briggs was.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Kaboom786 on September 23, 2010, 08:44:32 PM
The most unluckiest player in 1st class cricket is Mark Wagh (Notts). This guy is better then Trott, bell and collingwood combined but is never ever considered to play for England or lions/A team.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Alvaro on September 23, 2010, 08:46:14 PM
The most unluckiest player in 1st class cricket is Mark Wagh (Notts). This guy is better then Trott, bell and collingwood combined but is never ever considered to play for England or lions/A team.
i'm sure his salary as a corporate lawyer and his massive property portfolio makes up for it...
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Alvaro on September 23, 2010, 08:48:00 PM
a bit off-topic,
but why was jos buttler NOT included in the performance squad?
whereas danny briggs was.

lots of capable batsmen with more than 5 first class games are ahead of him? three first class ducks in a row really warrants recognition...

The lack of international class spinners would account for Briggs inclusion.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: niceonechoppy on September 23, 2010, 08:48:17 PM
The most unluckiest player in 1st class cricket is Mark Wagh (Notts). This guy is better then Trott, bell and collingwood combined but is never ever considered to play for England or lions/A team.
His first class average is 40, Bells/Trotts is higher but Collingwoods is lower. The problem with Wagh is that he has never really had profilic seasons averaging 60+, but always hovers around 35-45mark, whereas Collingwood in 2003 had a good year, Bell in 04 and Trott in 09, the selectors look for proflific form players.....
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: jamespaxton on September 23, 2010, 09:02:02 PM
imo, as a yorkshire fan, shahzad is better than bresnan, and i will never know how rashid has not been picked.( the stats shown by everyone before) back this up,
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: niceonechoppy on September 23, 2010, 09:08:16 PM
Rashid and Bopara arent even in the Performance Squad! What are they doing this winter?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: essexarsenal on September 23, 2010, 09:09:48 PM
Rashid and Bopara arent even in the Performance Squad! What are they doing this winter?

rashid is going to australia later on and ravi is playing cricket in south africa i beleive
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: 400notout on September 23, 2010, 09:23:10 PM
Adam Lyth I'm very pleased is selected to go across, he's done very well this season and deserves it. Hope he does well over in the Aussie conditions. IMO, I would pick Jason Krezja over Hauritz, how has he done the past wee while in state cricket? He offers a better option (slightly) with the bat, and I feel he's a better attacking option. Australia don't look half the team when they play a less attacking spinner!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Jeet on September 23, 2010, 10:49:06 PM
IMO, I would pick Jason Krezja over Hauritz, how has he done the past wee while in state cricket? He offers a better option (slightly) with the bat, and I feel he's a better attacking option. Australia don't look half the team when they play a less attacking spinner!
Krejza was pretty ordinary last season in the Australia domestic season. He took 14 F/C wickets @ 54.

Hauritz vs Krejza is a no brainer. Hauritz is far superior. 57 Test wickets @ 31.82. Hauritz is no mug with the bat either, he has 2 Test match 50's and averages 26 with the bat.

Additionally, Hauritz offers control, whereas Krejza goes around the park at a rate of knots!
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Coach on September 24, 2010, 02:16:23 AM
His first class average is 40, Bells/Trotts is higher but Collingwoods is lower. The problem with Wagh is that he has never really had profilic seasons averaging 60+, but always hovers around 35-45mark, whereas Collingwood in 2003 had a good year, Bell in 04 and Trott in 09, the selectors look for proflific form players.....

Are you suggesting that the man who got a double ton on the last ashes tour down under shouldn't play?
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: Tumo on September 24, 2010, 07:05:18 AM
My mistake mate, didn't realise that Samit is a takeaway guy.
He really is, I've got a pic of him from the 6th ODI last year at Trent Bridge nailing a cheeseburger from a burger van outside! Classic!

a bit off-topic,
but why was jos buttler NOT included in the performance squad?
whereas danny briggs was.
What Alvaro said.
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: mars on September 24, 2010, 03:07:50 PM
rashid is going to australia later on and ravi is playing cricket in south africa i beleive

But not with the Performance squad right? Or is he going for domestic cricket???
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: RoCo Da Pixie on September 24, 2010, 03:47:53 PM
But not with the Performance squad right? Or is he going for domestic cricket???

He is going to play grade cricket i beleive, Not with the performance squad
Title: Re: Ashes squad
Post by: mars on September 24, 2010, 03:54:09 PM
Feel very bad for him. He has put in a lot of effort which has paid off in the season. To not get rewarded yet again must knock him down a bit.