Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Woodworm MK II Pro Bag Vs GM Original Five Star Wheelie  (Read 1447 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Beaup123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 286
  • Trade Count: (0)
    • Cricket Kit Reviews!
Woodworm MK II Pro Bag Vs GM Original Five Star Wheelie
« on: January 05, 2014, 10:46:15 AM »

Woodworm:http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Woodworm-Pro-Series-MK-II-Cricket-Bag-With-Bat-Holders-Insulated-Pocket-/121026748055?pt=AU_Cricket_Sporting_Equipment&hash=item1c2dc19e97

GM:https://secure8.safecheckout.biz/gccc/star-original-wheelie-p-6384.html?osCsid=u6u9r3l8l70m1b1limduovm430

Just after any additional info or experiences with the bags. And an overall opinion on what you would get

Thanks In advance

swamidude

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Woodworm MK II Pro Bag Vs GM Original Five Star Wheelie
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2014, 01:38:26 PM »

Not sure about the woodworm but I've heard, seen and read that the GM bags are prone to tearing and they have fallen apart fairly quickly in many cases (although not all). Don't know if you can get them in Australia, but I can wholeheartedly recommend a Salix bag. They're top quality and extremely well built with loads of space.
Logged

Beaup123

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 286
  • Trade Count: (0)
    • Cricket Kit Reviews!
Re: Woodworm MK II Pro Bag Vs GM Original Five Star Wheelie
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2014, 01:45:05 PM »

Yeah there isn't much info around on either hence the topic  :D

Thanks for that info. Unfortunately It costs stupid amounts to get bags to Oz so the choices are very limited with major brands.

Thanks again

cleanbowled

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 165
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Woodworm MK II Pro Bag Vs GM Original Five Star Wheelie
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2014, 02:13:51 PM »

I use one of those bags (Woodworm), they are pretty good in my opinion and very good value considering everything else that size is way more expensive (the bags are pretty huge, i think as big or bigger than anything else in Oz).

By the way mate, might be a better idea to buy directly from the oo.com.au site, as if you happen to like something else as well (not just cricket gear) then you can combine shipping and save (they sometimes have a $10 cap on orders as well). Also they have a whole bunch of woodworm stuff including bats etc, so if you like the brand that would be the place to go.
Logged

jwebber86

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1765
  • Trade Count: (+12)
Re: Woodworm MK II Pro Bag Vs GM Original Five Star Wheelie
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2014, 04:46:54 PM »

i had the previous version of the woodworm, (its still in the attic holding all my back up gear) i used it for 4/5 seasons the only problem i had was the pocket which was the same end as the wheels dragged on the ground when i was pulling it, i had it full of balls and im 6"2. it looks like the picture shows they have moved the bag to the other end of the bag so this shouldnt be an issue
Logged
@james_webber
@dunstercricket
gone from being the opening batsmen to being the opening bowler after the first 6 league games

Boydie

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 68
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Woodworm MK II Pro Bag Vs GM Original Five Star Wheelie
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2014, 08:50:50 PM »

Like others I've had bad experiences with gm luggage. The original bag I had was pretty awful. The strap was too short to pull it along with which meant having to use the extendable one which is all very well on flat ground but not on grass. Also tore in several places so would probably avoid it.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Logged
 

Advertise on CBF