@ProCricketer1982 thanks for the heads up
They should be held to account - I believe Downton and Moores have. Giles Clarke has positioned himself where he's untouchable, he's become Teflon, akin to Blatter at FIFA. Graves said something he is clearly now trying to deny. Strauss is guilty of supporting the captain.
The problem with the ECB executive selection process - and the majority of NGBs in this country - is that to really affect change and get a fully modernised system in place that will constantly work towards progressive change, you have to get those in power to vote themselves out to change the system - the whole turkeys voting for Christmas scenario.
I know that's not exactly what you're saying - you're suggesting that Cook, Strauss, Graves should be sacked for continued incompetence in handling the KP issue. Thing is, unless you are absolutely certain that KP is throwing straight dice (and Michael Vaughan has already said that Piers Morgan's version of the facts regarding meetings Morgan claims Vaughan was involved in are untrue) and telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth, you can't expect an external investigation or an ECB committee decision.
I know he's been sacked and they stay in their jobs and I agree with you that they should be accountable and their management of this has been shocking, but unless you call for a Parliamentary review, what can you do? They are in constitutional power at the ECB. They run the game. They won't resign and who knows, in the coming years they may get it right and get English cricket back to where it needs to be.
Viva La Revolution...