Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Full Shape vs concaving full spine  (Read 1294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

alexevo94

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 764
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Full Shape vs concaving full spine
« on: December 12, 2018, 07:12:47 PM »

I've probably missed this topic being spoke about, but i was just wondering people opinions on would they recommend a full spine with concaving on the sides, or full profile minimal concaving. I have both bats prefer the spine through the toe but presumed as there was less wood it wouldn't be as good as a full profile.
Logged

SD

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1391
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Full Shape vs concaving full spine
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2018, 07:33:33 PM »

I use bats at the upper end of the weight scale so go for minimal or no concaving but still with edges that just scrape through the bat gauge but if I did use lighter bats I would prefer to have concaving with bigger edges than a full profile
Logged

Seniorplayer

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6236
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Full Shape vs concaving full spine
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2018, 08:53:01 PM »

Full back no concaving I think full spine benefits pros who  tend to. middle the ball more
Logged

ManHOOS

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 253
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Full Shape vs concaving full spine
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2018, 10:04:11 PM »

I have used both concaved and full profile, bat sometimes twist in my hands while playing shots with concaved, full profile will give you maximum power behind your strokes :)
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF