Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Harry Brook's bat  (Read 7588 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jimbo

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3250
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #30 on: March 01, 2023, 08:25:40 AM »

Gap in the market clearly 😅
Logged

MichaelM

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 128
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #31 on: March 01, 2023, 09:01:39 AM »

I've seen kookaburras with knobs.
Logged

Jimbo

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3250
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #32 on: March 01, 2023, 10:02:31 AM »

Ooh err missus.
Logged

Jaffa

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1529
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #33 on: March 01, 2023, 10:03:15 AM »

Oslo  :D

There's a chance my next project is in Bergen. A little closer.
Logged
Tell it to my bread in the morning. You just became my backup toaster.

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5408
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #34 on: March 01, 2023, 11:01:17 AM »

There's a chance my next project is in Bergen. A little closer.
A mere 7 hours drive, pop over on evening  :D
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

thegowerwaft

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 594
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #35 on: March 31, 2023, 08:51:08 PM »

Logged
"The only way he was ever likely to play cricket at the highest level would be if he played on the top of a mountain" Mrs Harper 2014

Chompy9760

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 272
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #36 on: March 31, 2023, 11:17:31 PM »

I like the bat and the video, but those stickers are WAY overdone!  Guess they will look right at home in the IPL though :)
Logged

Chalkie

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 991
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #37 on: April 01, 2023, 07:28:01 AM »

Interesting that the handle looks like it had 5 springs, rather than the more usual 3, I guess he likes a handle with a bit of whip?

Does it make the handle weaker? Would be good to hear from makers on the forum about views on this and what you tend to use in your handles?
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12674
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #38 on: April 01, 2023, 07:32:26 AM »

It is to help reduce shoulder breaks.
Not sure it will make a difference on the stiffness in the handle
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

Chalkie

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 991
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #39 on: April 01, 2023, 09:31:19 AM »

It is to help reduce shoulder breaks.
Not sure it will make a difference on the stiffness in the handle

Thanks Buzz, just to clarify, are you saying that 5 springs brings a greater risk of shoulder breaks (or the other way round?)
Logged

jonny77

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2422
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #40 on: April 01, 2023, 09:40:16 AM »

Think he's saying they feel it may reduce shoulder breaks. However, I've seen many a CA with shoulder cracks and 5 rubbers. Suppose it depends on the quality of handles overall really. I'm sure GNs are good quality obviously.
Logged

Chalkie

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 991
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #41 on: April 01, 2023, 10:10:52 AM »

Ok, but surely if 5 springs was thought to reduce risk of shoulder breaks then more manufacturers would have them rather than 3?

Or is the cost to produce a 5 spring handle materially higher? Or is there another reason for not going with 5?
Logged

Chad

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3007
  • Trade Count: (+22)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #42 on: April 01, 2023, 11:37:55 AM »

If all manufacturers did the same or had the same thoughts about batmaking, it would be boring as hell. Would save me a tonne of money and space as I'd have less variety to want to buy 😂


I believe they initially introduced it in the Cobra for the Aus range. The thinking behind it was that if you have a low middle, and kept the shoulders and handle thick, you'd need a little more flex in the handle to have a little more give to prevent it from feeling too clunky, and to help prevent breakages.


Reasons why others won't have adopted is probably manufacturing costs, hassle, possibly weight due to more glue and inserts, they don't have the capability to make them consistently, they don't believe there's any benefit, etc etc.
Logged

Chalkie

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 991
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #43 on: April 01, 2023, 11:47:50 AM »

Cheers @Chad that explains it well and makes a lot of sense.
Logged

MichaelM

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 128
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Harry Brook's bat
« Reply #44 on: April 01, 2023, 11:53:51 AM »

If all manufacturers did the same or had the same thoughts about batmaking, it would be boring as hell. Would save me a tonne of money and space as I'd have less variety to want to buy 😂


I believe they initially introduced it in the Cobra for the Aus range. The thinking behind it was that if you have a low middle, and kept the shoulders and handle thick, you'd need a little more flex in the handle to have a little more give to prevent it from feeling too clunky, and to help prevent breakages.


Reasons why others won't have adopted is probably manufacturing costs, hassle, possibly weight due to more glue and inserts, they don't have the capability to make them consistently, they don't believe there's any benefit, etc etc.
Makes sense
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 

Advertise on CBF