Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Luke Wright  (Read 2226 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: Luke Wright
« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2011, 01:51:42 PM »

I think he's a decent player and gets a hard deal most of the time due to where he comes in and bats. I think he's under used as a bowler as he can get some decent pace and he's got that skiddy action that's never too easy to play. Would like to see him go back to county cricket though to get some form behind him.

However I do think that Bopara is a better player than him and would've put him in the squad infront of Wright
Logged

langer17

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2002
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Luke Wright
« Reply #16 on: February 10, 2011, 04:52:11 PM »

Well I think this may Interest you Jon.

"Clarity on what Luke Wright actually is. Unfortunately we cannot say "check" for this. Even a seven-match series isn't long enough to clarify whether Wright is a batsman who bowls, a one-day bowler who slogs, a fielder who bats-and-bowls or simply a blank canvas who doesn't get injured."

I thought this was amussing as I totally agree.

It's at the bottom of this article: http://www.espncricinfo.com/page2/content/story/500136.html
Logged

100 not out

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2244
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: Luke Wright
« Reply #17 on: February 10, 2011, 04:58:18 PM »

Not international standard for me  . . .im afraid. at best he will be 5/6 overs bowler and make a 30 for u .  not good enough, i dont rate Bresnan too.

 
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF