Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011  (Read 4714 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

china

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Trade Count: (0)
« Last Edit: April 08, 2011, 11:51:49 PM by china »
Logged

Talisman

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
  • Trade Count: (+76)
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2011, 07:29:37 AM »

Many brands = SS
Logged

justnotcricket86

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4071
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2011, 07:54:28 AM »

I'm amazed SS are not reviewed, my ones are class and getting a second pair from Mike. Saying that, the Hawk ones are SS I suppose
Logged
The minute you hesitate, you're in trouble - Steve Waugh

china

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2011, 07:45:41 PM »

Was  most certainly replacing my old SS with new SS.
Now thinking about the M&H. They look sweet.

Can they be as good or better?

In aus we don't really have an outlet where we can even try them for fit/feel.
Logged

King pair

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 802
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2011, 04:42:58 PM »

Does nobody else think that Wisden tend to concentrate on the aethetics of the item rather than the performance? Especially the WK equipment. I take it "the don" isn't a gloveman?!
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 12676
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2011, 05:32:59 PM »

Does nobody else think that Wisden tend to concentrate on the aethetics of the item rather than the performance? Especially the WK equipment. I take it "the don" isn't a gloveman?!
King Pair - welcome to the show.
And yes this is a very astute comment,couldn't agree more with you, but largely that is what makes players buy equipment
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

peplow

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6791
  • Trade Count: (+77)
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2011, 07:24:41 PM »

have to say i treid on some of the m and h gloves the other day in globe sports, they were VERY supple and fitted like a dream, better than my customs!
Logged

King pair

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 802
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2011, 10:52:16 AM »

Thanks very m,uch Buzz, been reading the forum for a while but thought it was time to get involved.

I agree this seems to be the way equipment is selected (and each to their own i suppose) but I would just expect "good gear" and "good looking gear" to be differentiated slightly.

I'm in the market for a new pair peplow so I might have to find somewhere stocking those to have a look. I've struggled to buy anything other than kook silvers for the past 5 or so years but my most recent pair have now practically disintigrated so im gonna have a shop around. I've seen a few rating the SS gloves as well? Might be worth a look?
Logged

justnotcricket86

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4071
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2011, 10:55:38 AM »

I would give this years SS Gladiators a look mate, I have the Players ones and some Camo LE ones which are pretty good.

Getting the new Puma Tricks 5000 gloves today as well so will have to work out what I like best and flog the other 2 on
Logged
The minute you hesitate, you're in trouble - Steve Waugh

jonpinson

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2916
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Wisden Good Gear Guide 2011
« Reply #9 on: April 26, 2011, 10:56:26 AM »

You have to take a review like that with a pinch of salt when they mark a bat down for being too heavy. Does that make it somehow inferior or lacking in performance? No, just personal opinion. If they can do it with a bat they can do it with every piece of kit. It is useful as a guide to see what is available out there that might not be stocked in your local shop, but don't read too much into the scores.
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF