Bad looks and great performance
Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Bad looks and great performance  (Read 1331 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Beachcricket

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 855
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Bad looks and great performance
« on: May 02, 2011, 11:20:32 AM »
2 things got me started on this, firstly perception of a bats quality because of its looks, and secondly that I seem to be the only person at my club that thinks it's possible to get a great performing wavy grained, knot ridden, water damaged bat.

Having thought about the "£400 bat" that appeared on here a while ago, it got me thinking about looks and performance. Whilst similar topics have raised this point, I would like to offer a possible twist or proposition.

The potential performance that the "£400 bat" offered was phenomenal, it looked beautiful and had the seal of approval from Talisman who, as we all know, is abundantly aware of what a good bat is.

However is it possible to get the same level of potential performance out of a bat that's all kinds of ugly?
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12678
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: Bad looks and great performance
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2011, 01:05:01 PM »
you mean like a velum bat but with pro performance... oooh

maybe a lucky pressing session perhaps?
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

SkipperJ

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 390
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Bad looks and great performance
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2011, 03:34:25 PM »
Doesn't really have to be velum bad I suppose ... just wavy uneven grains, heartwood, pin knots and butterfly/bar stains would make it ugly enough
Logged
CBF gave me BAD real bad!
(BAD = Bat Acquisition Disorder)

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8816
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: Bad looks and great performance
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2011, 04:10:20 PM »
As I posted before, this bat taps superbly and is a net back from a Pakistan International test batsman.
But looks totally rubbish!! Dirty looking grains and certainly not the most cosmetically stunning bat in my collection!  :(


Logged

Beachcricket

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 855
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Bad looks and great performance
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2011, 04:38:42 PM »
This is what I'm talking about, it's certainly less attractive when compared to some of the belters in your collection but it doesn't make me recoil in horror. Surely a really hideous piece of wood could make a belting bat? (unless I've completely misunderstood what makes a good bat).
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF