BAS Millenium review
Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: BAS Millenium review  (Read 3619 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rbanners

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 95
  • Trade Count: (0)
BAS Millenium review
« on: June 15, 2012, 01:41:05 PM »

Dear All

This is my first post so forgive me if I make any faux pas's. I recently bought a BAS Millenium from Uzi Sports, after speaking with Uzi about it. I was after a 2.11 having bought a lower grade MRF and Uzi picked me out one which he recommended. I had been playing with much lighter bats (circa 2.8) but the pick up on the MRF made me feel like I could handle more wood (!). Service was of course excellent, and Uzi was very patient.

So, here are some pictures and observations (sorry if this doesnt work, like I said, first post):






Sorry about the armchair, these photos were taken standing in the window on an iphone, so will do better next time. As you can see, pretty standard Asian bat profile, bowed, not really any concaving and its a big piece of wood, the prettiest I have really. It is finished very well with a mildly oval handle. Pick up is good but not great - it certainly doesnt feel any lighter than it is, though it has been improved after removing the octopus grip (which just feels like a glove shredder to me) and replaced with an aero grip (also from Uzi) on top of a standard thin grip: this feels very nice - like a padded tennis racket grip.

Having oiled it and knocked it in and used it in a brief net session, I can say the feel is wonderful: it somehow feels 'softer' than the Woodstock Tour de Force I bought recently, but this being concaved, picks up lighter than its 2.11. The middle is mid placed, and with the ever-so-slight bottom-heavy pick up, encourages front foot driving or swinging through cow corner. So far, the middle seems like it gives pretty good rebound. I like the fact that it has no concaving - the TdF seems to feel more hollow and jarry as a result of the concaving. Does anyone else find this to be the case with concaved bats?

Overall, its a lovely thing, and though not personally hand made in England, gives an impression of having been made well, from a nice piece of Grade 1 willow. There dont seem to be many BAS reviews, so I thought this might be useful. I have a very old SG Sunny Tonny also, that is an old fashioned flat bat (no bowing or concaving), with a normal height spine and thin edges, so this is only my second Indian bat, but from the looks of things, very different to the SS and SG bats seen in the IPL.

Oh I also bought the BAS Sachin gloves - they are nice but heavy compared to my 16 year old SG Dazzler gloves. Can you tell I've only started playing again after a long hiatus?

Ta
Banners
Logged

thecord

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1979
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: BAS Millenium review
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2012, 01:45:39 PM »

Good first post, welcome to the forum!
Uzi Sports high praise combined with this review makes me think I might have to give a BAS a try at some point
Logged

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: BAS Millenium review
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2012, 02:08:22 PM »

Hi rbanners

Having purchased a few BAS bats from Asad myself, I know you'll have a good bat which will improve as the bat is played in! Good choice of bat - and hope it goes well for you.
Welcome to the forum and feel free to post pics of your older bats too! I know you said that the SG has a more traditional profile, but there are a lot of us on the forum who are still very fond of the older profiles!  8)
Logged

Cumbrian Pete

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 316
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Wicket Keeper / Batsman
Re: BAS Millenium review
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2012, 02:20:32 PM »

Hi rb, top post and interesting review...looks like a well finished bat too.
Logged

rbanners

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 95
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: BAS Millenium review
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2012, 02:46:26 PM »

Thanks, Pete and Pete! It does look and feel like this will do well, assuming I can do my bit with it out in the middle.

If there is interest, I will get some pics of the old SG up - to be honest, it is my preferred sort of shape, and watching footage from some of the old England vs West Indies tests that was on during the rain delay made me wonder what it would be like to have an old fashioned bat like that re-interpreted by some of today's master podshavers.

I know there has been a long discussion recently about concaving vs traditional spines, and my anecdotal evidence, based on a limited number of concaved bats (Chase 175 Finback and Woodstock TdF) and bats with no concaving (BAS, SG and M&H Harlequin)...well, I certainly prefer the feel of the more traditional profile. And by feel, I mean how the leather feels on willow.

Sorry for ramble! Thanks for your comments. Seeing as I am still new, if I were to post pictures of the SG, where should they go?
Ta
Banners
Logged

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: BAS Millenium review
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2012, 02:53:44 PM »

Banners

Feel free to post pics on this topic (as a continuation) or start a seperate topic for the SG?
And don't worry about rambling on....it's what a lot of us do on this forum....but it's a good thing!  ;)
There are good things about the more traditional profiles as well - a lot of people do seem to love the big edges but you'll find a mixture on here! I like both but will always like the Mjolnir type profile!
Logged

rbanners

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 95
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: BAS Millenium review
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2012, 07:41:18 PM »

OK then, Pete, here are some pics of a 1994/5 SG Sunny Tonny, bought whilst on holiday in Calcutta (Kolkata, my parents home town). All the bats in the shop were 'varnished', nothing available with a natural finish. This is actually my second one of these, the first did me for almost 4 seasons at school. It picks up like it looks, but is easy to waft about. The middle is reasonably sized and compared to my Chase and the Woodstock, feels very soft and forgiving and has good rebound. It only has 6 very widely spaced grains.






It is not an inspirational piece of bat design, I grant you, but there is something pleasing in its simplicity, which is conveyed to its function: to me, it suits any particular style of play and surface, and rewards timing. Its probably much more like the sort of bat that Sunny himself used. Unlike many modern Indian bats, it has a curved as opposed to completely flat face, and no bow whatsoever! It has a three sprung handle and probably weighs 2.13 though it does pick up lighter than this.

I am not a natural six-hitter, so it suits me fine. Or perhaps I'm just nostalgic and my attempts at reasoning are to assuage this. It was about £30 when Dad bought me it, and was my third bat after a size 6 Duncan Fearnley and an earlier one of these.

Ta
Banners
Logged

Andypara

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: BAS Millenium review
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2012, 08:04:02 PM »

 
Looks a cracking bat
Logged

rbanners

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 95
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: BAS Millenium review
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2012, 08:43:31 PM »

Thanks, Andy. They are both nice in their own ways. The old SG doesnt seem any poorer on performance owing to its inferior spine height and edge size, which seems odd.

Perhaps I've never had an absolute stonker of a bat and have lived with closed horizons. This forum certainly seems to have opened my eyes. Its funny how much things have changed over a decade and a half.

What are your thoughts/preferences with regards bat shaping? I've never had a Mjolnir that Pete Hosk mentioned. Will put up a review of the Woodstock Tour de Force when get back from holiday, but we've only had 3 games this season so far, so not getting enough opportunity to use these meaningfully.
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF