Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves  (Read 8944 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

trypewriter

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2227
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves
« Reply #30 on: December 31, 2013, 05:36:19 PM »

I think GarettJ makes a good point - also Tim - but you never know until you get nipped by one!
Logged
'His was a cameo of savage cuts and pulls - the tragedy being that none made contact with the ball.'

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves
« Reply #31 on: December 31, 2013, 05:38:21 PM »

Interesting, I've been looking at these as well. Just out of interest, did you go for the sausage style or the Joe Root segmented ones?
Got a pair of last seasons segmented ones and another pair of this years segmented ones on the way mate.
Really like them on first impression (and the new pair weren't just to match my bat, honest... :-[ )
Logged

gihanrat

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 177
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves
« Reply #32 on: December 31, 2013, 05:43:33 PM »

Out of interest, anyone had any experience with the BAS 'Tendulkar' gloves - many subcontinent international players seem to use these with their sponsors branding added? From what I can see (admittedly from photos on the www) they look like they take some beating (pardon the pun) when it comes to taking blows on the hand - extra finger protection also for the top hand ring finger and little pinkie. These international players must think highly of these gloves if they continue to use them despite various other gloves offeredby their sponsors.
Logged

Number 11

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 516
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves
« Reply #33 on: January 01, 2014, 02:13:11 AM »

Have a look at the reviews on It's Just Cricket.
Basically the top end of any brand especially Salix, M&H, Newberry will be really good as well as those from H4L, BlankBats, Aldred's etc. So many to choose from it's ridiculous.
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves
« Reply #34 on: January 01, 2014, 09:50:52 AM »

Newbery SPS have always felt very strong when I've used them. I picks up a pair from lorimers on bay for about £40
Logged

SOULMAN1012

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6821
  • Trade Count: (+27)
Re: Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves
« Reply #35 on: January 01, 2014, 10:45:03 AM »

For me out of all the softs I own & have owned the best 2 pairs I have at each end of financial spectrum is top end GN Legends and mid range the HitsHard power gloves, both super comfortable and offer great protection. I've been hit whilst wearing both at 75mph+ and as long as hit flush in gloves you hardly feel through either.
Logged

gihanrat

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 177
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Protection Cricket Batting Gloves
« Reply #36 on: January 04, 2014, 10:39:05 AM »

Interesting observation last night watching that woeful but all to common batting display by England.

The Burnley Lara took a couple of blows on the hands yesterday from Mad Mitch. One hit him flush on the top hand at 90+mph trapping his hand against the handle, and he seemed ok. When he asked for the magic spray it was a glancing blow on the thumb of the bottom hand which caused him pain. The commentators thought it was the blow on the tophand he was getting treatment for, but in fact it was his bottom hand thumb.

Just goes to show

a) the glove when hit flush by a 5.5oz missile even at 90+mph can protect the hands well without too much discomfort afterwards

b) even these 'super-douper' gloves did not provide much comfort from a glancing blow - this would be difficult to protect against unless a whole new radical design is thought up (any takers?). However some would say it did a good enough job to prevent a fracture (unless another xray pops up on a twitter account somewhere....)

I guess what I'm saying is that these top of the range gloves can withstand what they can be reliably tested against - ie a flush hit at 90+mph, but simulating accurately and reproducibly a glancing blow is nigh on impossible, so they do the job they are tested for.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 

Advertise on CBF