When I was 17 I got accused of chucking by the oppo, league appeared at random games, asked me to attend a sports hall for videoing. And was cleared by the league.
Despite changing teams thrice and switching leagues, I never got called again...... Until our forum net at dotball. Cheers guys.
This year one of our bowlers was called for chucking. The umpire stood at square leg and screamed no ball, followed by. He's chucking it, at top of his voice.
Lads 16, seemed to shake him. Both caps and umpires got together to have a word, not entirely sure what was said.
4balls later the umpire screamed no ball and, it's a definite chuck!! At top of his voice.
Lad shouted take me off to skip, skip had word with ump, bowlers end up(head of umps) was adamant this was not the correct way of doing things. And asked if we could bowl him from the other end so he could have a look.
We swapped him ends despite his reluctance. And this ump said he saw nothing wrong with the action he could call a no ball for.
We got a letter from league asking if we could let them know when his next game was as they wanted to view and assess the action.
We told them an u17 game as he's refusing sat cricket.
5 umps went, viewed him and all agreed his action was fine.
He hasn't played a game since though, the episode hit him hard and he doesn't see why he should waste a Saturday to be embarrassed by an umpire(umpire actually got a warning for his behaviour).
Our league say that the ruling should be. If square leg relieves it is a no ball, they get together at the end of the over to discuss.
They then both try to monitor during the game, and discuss with both bowler and captain.
After game discussion with league as to weather more assessment needed.
If more assessment leads to ruling it's a throw, player isn't allowed to bowl until proven its remedied.
When remedied club inform league and they send a third umpire to that game to look.
Unless an obvious throw, they are not meant to call during game.