Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]

Author Topic: WT20 Squad  (Read 12872 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #60 on: March 12, 2016, 11:40:31 AM »
Cricinfo has England 38 for none, but hales and Roy on 7 each.



I just want to know the score!!
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

Sam

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1582
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #61 on: March 12, 2016, 11:42:32 AM »
Quote from: smilley792 on March 12, 2016, 11:40:31 AM
Cricinfo has England 38 for none, but hales and Roy on 7 each.



I just want to know the score!!

46/0 off 5, Hales on 10 Roy on 35 
Logged

Sam

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1582
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #62 on: March 12, 2016, 11:52:42 AM »
Roy's removed the doubt on his place with a rapid 50 in the 7th over.
Logged

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #63 on: March 12, 2016, 11:53:36 AM »
Roys got 50......not hundred percent sure on the accurateness on the info I'm given though


Reckon they will retire in this or just keep going?
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

Sam

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1582
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #64 on: March 12, 2016, 11:55:02 AM »
Given theyve agreed to play 11 v 11 I expect they'll just keep going as if it were a fully competitive match.
Logged

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #65 on: March 12, 2016, 11:58:08 AM »
Quote from: Sam on March 12, 2016, 11:55:02 AM
Given theyve agreed to play 11 v 11 I expect they'll just keep going as if it were a fully competitive match.

He out now anyway. Lol.
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #66 on: March 12, 2016, 12:45:53 PM »
England win by 6 wickets. Nice warm up victory. Let's take hat into the tournament please
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

rickjames

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5094
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #67 on: March 12, 2016, 12:46:44 PM »
ALL HAIL ROY

But man I cant deal with Chris Jordan
Logged

Woodyspin

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2232
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • www.twitter.com/thewoodyspin
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #68 on: March 15, 2016, 06:39:15 PM »


KPs view on Vince... Funny that considering his tweet when the squad was announced
Logged

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #69 on: March 15, 2016, 06:43:02 PM »
Kp said Luke wright should be in t20 squad before Vince.


Kp says Vince should be in the test side.


Two things that have no bearing on each other. Ones test and t20 ability are not the same.
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

Woodyspin

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2232
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • www.twitter.com/thewoodyspin
Re: WT20 Squad
« Reply #70 on: March 15, 2016, 06:47:09 PM »
Quote from: smilley792 on March 15, 2016, 06:43:02 PM
Kp said Luke wright should be in t20 squad before Vince.


Kp says Vince should be in the test side.


Two things that have no bearing on each other. Ones test and t20 ability are not the same.
"Saw him play three/four shots in the PSL, a pull, a drive and a defensive shot and you can tell he has ability"

Yet he laughed he was picked
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF