This may have been mentioned before but can't seem to find one topic that explains it.
As currently there is a massive demand for massive bats that are extremely light it got me thinking of how bat making has evolved over the years and how big the bats are now, even compared to last years models.
So basically my understanding of how bats have become so light for the size they are, is how dry the bat is and the way that it's pressed?
For example if two bats were both 2'10 (both similar in shape) and bat 1 had 25mm edges and 45mm spine, bat 2 had 40mm edges and 50mm spine. Then bat 2 should have less moisture in the bat?
What does this mean for the each bat? Would bat 1 have a longer expected life than bat 2? Would bat 2 perform better than bat 1? Would bat 1 have a longer/bigger sweetspot? Would bat 1 need longer knocking-in before it's ready to play?
There are so many questions, but it did get me thinking as currently on espn I'm watching some highlights of the 1983 cricket world cup and the bats they have there have tiny profiles however they can still hit it out of the ground with the same effort. So have bats performance really changed over the years? Obviously the techniques on how bats are made have as the size of them nowadays are huge!