Print

[ajm90]

As the helmets soooo much better than the competition shouldnt it be tested at 150 mph +  just to prove how good it actually is 

[peplow]

As the helmets soooo much better than the competition shouldnt it be tested at 150 mph +  just to prove how good it actually is 

steady mate, we like tom and dont wanna kill him.

[peplow]

thats the one!!

[johnnyw]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C9aiWr0Vfg

[darthlewis1]

Can you only get nutty buddy's in America, because I really want one after seeing the video's on the nutty buddy.

[johnnyw]

Can you only get nutty buddy's in America, because I really want one after seeing the video's on the nutty buddy.

Maybe an Idea for someone to buy some to save on postage

[langer17]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C9aiWr0Vfg

The website for the Nutty Buddy is the same as the H4L website design, ahah lol.

[darthlewis1]

Ok I just found out that in baseball the nutty buddy is mainly meant for the fielder's, do they hit it alot harder in baseball or are they just not as good at fielding compared to cricketer's. The only fielder's in cricket to wear a box are the wicket keeper's and close fielder's so why do they need it in baseball?

[Johnny]

Ok I just found out that in baseball the nutty buddy is mainly meant for the fielder's, do they hit it alot harder in baseball or are they just not as good at fielding compared to cricketer's. The only fielder's in cricket to wear a box are the wicket keeper's and close fielder's so why do they need it in baseball?

And they wear gloves to catch too!

[jonpinson]

Ok I just found out that in baseball the nutty buddy is mainly meant for the fielder's, do they hit it alot harder in baseball or are they just not as good at fielding compared to cricketer's. The only fielder's in cricket to wear a box are the wicket keeper's and close fielder's so why do they need it in baseball?

It has the potential to come back much harder, yes, and more frequently too.

[darthlewis1]

It has the potential to come back much harder, yes, and more frequently too.

I can understand that, but surely the out fielders don't wear them aswell.

[langer17]

I reckon that this would be good for cricket. If a bloke can take a baseball at 90mph at a distance of 5 metres and be perfectly fine, then it would deffinately be a useful cricket box.

[Lekka Global Alliance]

I reckon that this would be good for cricket. If a bloke can take a baseball at 90mph at a distance of 5 metres and be perfectly fine, then it would deffinately be a useful cricket box.

I think you may find that the overall density of a cricket ball far exceeds that of a baseball. It still looks a good product that can be worked on in all 5 sizes available currently by Nutty.

[langer17]

I think you may find that the overall density of a cricket ball far exceeds that of a baseball. It still looks a good product that can be worked on in all 5 sizes available currently by Nutty.

It deffinately does, but the products out there now are ones that they tested, including the common ones for cricket. Plus I doubt anyone faces 90mph from 5 metres away in cricket, so that should account for the difference in density of the balls.

I seriously reckon cricket shops should start stocking it.

[Lekka Global Alliance]

Cricket shops rarely buy stock as most are on 30,60,90 or 120 day accounts.  Best off buy direct from the states in half dozens and share the shipping costs with your team mates (as Johnny has suggested).