Advertise on CBF

Poll

Which style?

Modern
- 15 (46.9%)
Traditional
- 17 (53.1%)

Total Members Voted: 32

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Traditional vs. Modern Pads  (Read 4012 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Simmy

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6101
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Traditional vs. Modern Pads
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2011, 09:38:17 PM »

i use flex techs. i think there better than traditional 1's but (No Swearing Please) me if u get hit on bad on edge it hurts lol
Logged

MD2812

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1504
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hi, I'm Joe
Re: Traditional vs. Modern Pads
« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2011, 09:36:18 PM »

I use addidas pro wicket keeping pads, find them comfy and good when i've been hit on them but they dont seem to bend/wrap around my leg like i'd like them to.

Want some aero pads.

Joe

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1471
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Traditional vs. Modern Pads
« Reply #17 on: November 08, 2011, 07:40:59 AM »


Want some aero pads.
I have some small P3 batting pads for sale that work excellently as keeping pads - quite a few people use them as wicket keeping pads. Very wrap around and moulded.
Logged

StandUpKeeps

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 241
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • 'Confidence Is The Key In Cricket'
Re: Traditional vs. Modern Pads
« Reply #18 on: January 20, 2012, 04:58:08 PM »

I have both Puma Iridium 5000 (modern) and GM Paul Nixon's (traditional) and personally i like both but i feel that the Puma's offer more protection, are lighter and more comfortable...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF