England vs Pakistan
Advertise on CBF
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 47

Author Topic: England vs Pakistan  (Read 101698 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5409
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #510 on: February 03, 2012, 11:48:37 AM »
Quote from: golders on February 03, 2012, 11:27:51 AM
Yeah. the deliveries that dismissed morgan and broad barely turned...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZnfVPyfT14
He's not in the same class as your Lyons and beers though mate!It's all comparative.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6752
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #511 on: February 03, 2012, 12:01:44 PM »
Oh dear!  I've always been a fan of the DRS but that is the third or fourth time in this series that it has "upheld" an absolute shocker.  There's no way that a ball brushing a fraction of the top of one bail should be LBW...
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Number4

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4486
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #512 on: February 03, 2012, 12:07:30 PM »
Without DRS the umpire gave it out so either way it's out.

Excellent decision By the umpire I think. 2 inches or 2mm the ball was hitting the stumps if his pad wasn't in the way
« Last Edit: February 03, 2012, 12:16:57 PM by Number4 »
Logged
This information is for educational purposes only.
Under no circumstances can this be copied or reproduced in any way without the permission of the author

johnnyw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2058
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #513 on: February 03, 2012, 12:28:11 PM »
Talk about bad luck for bell
Logged

Number4

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4486
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #514 on: February 03, 2012, 12:31:15 PM »
You always need luck in a good innings. Poms don't seem to have any luck at all at the moment
Logged
This information is for educational purposes only.
Under no circumstances can this be copied or reproduced in any way without the permission of the author

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #515 on: February 03, 2012, 12:37:15 PM »
Got to feel for bell as looking at replays he would have got back if the keeper had taken it then stumped him
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

The_Bird

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2977
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #516 on: February 03, 2012, 12:39:14 PM »
One thing DRS is doing is educating Adnan Akmal about the LBW rule, 16 unsuccessful appeals thru DRS lol Misbah & co need to have a word
Logged

langer17

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2002
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #517 on: February 03, 2012, 12:49:51 PM »
Quote from: Manormanic on February 03, 2012, 12:01:44 PM
Oh dear!  I've always been a fan of the DRS but that is the third or fourth time in this series that it has "upheld" an absolute shocker.  There's no way that a ball brushing a fraction of the top of one bail should be LBW...

Why not? His pad prevented the ball from hitting it, where it otherwise would have.

I see your point though, how accurate is the system really and how can it say that the ball is or is not going to just hit the stumps.
Logged

mdl_1979

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 796
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #518 on: February 03, 2012, 12:50:44 PM »
That'll be the end of Morgan's Test career then.  Shame, as he has lots of talent in the shorter forms of the game.
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12676
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #519 on: February 03, 2012, 12:59:37 PM »
Quote from: mdl_1979 on February 03, 2012, 12:50:44 PM
That'll be the end of Morgan's Test career then.  Shame, as he has lots of talent in the shorter forms of the game.
I don't agree, he will be back, not for a while though.
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

Simmy

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6101
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #520 on: February 03, 2012, 01:04:50 PM »
Quote from: langer17 on February 03, 2012, 12:49:51 PM
how accurate is the system really and how can it say that the ball is or is not going to just hit the stumps.

as mentioned 100 times before!

this is used by the military for missile tracking!

if it wasnt the best most acurate system in the world am sure they wouldnt use it in the ariforce etc then there budget is ££££££££££££££££££££££££
Logged

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5409
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #521 on: February 03, 2012, 01:10:45 PM »
I do think the should be a hard and fast rule for how much of the ball needs to be hitting regardless of the umpires original decision.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #522 on: February 03, 2012, 01:11:33 PM »
England is 0-6 (or 99-6) not a bad comeback from Pakistan
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

Kulli

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5409
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #523 on: February 03, 2012, 01:12:46 PM »
Pakistan's batting line up is super shaky and England's middle order is brutal against the spinning ball. makes for addictive viewing though.
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

golders

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2055
  • Trade Count: (+10)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #524 on: February 03, 2012, 01:13:53 PM »
Quote from: mdl_1979 on February 03, 2012, 12:50:44 PM
That'll be the end of Morgan's Test career then.  Shame, as he has lots of talent in the shorter forms of the game.

I reckon he might get another chance in the 2nd innings? Big prssur on the lad though, huge!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 47
« previous next »
 

Advertise on CBF