Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15

Author Topic: England In Sri Lanka  (Read 30455 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

legger123

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 938
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #180 on: April 04, 2012, 02:21:36 PM »

In England, I'd expect them to ditch Patel and give Taylor a go against WI. I'd like them to give him a go ahead of SA. I feel that 3 man seam attack out of; Finn, Broad, Anderson and Bresnan and then the Spin of Swann in English conditions will be enough. Like the comment before I'd possibly give a test each to Root and Taylor against the WI.
Logged

mattw

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2259
  • Trade Count: (+9)
    • PRYZM Cricket
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #181 on: April 04, 2012, 02:26:39 PM »

I'd like to see Taylor/Carberry or someone come in for the odd test. However I do not think that Root is ready for International cricket yet.
Logged

charlie15

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 826
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Can't bat, can't bowl, but love the game
    • W&HCC
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #182 on: April 04, 2012, 03:07:03 PM »

Trouble is who do you leave out for Root, Strauss who could probably do with being involved in the WI series or Cook?  I can't see Root playing to be honest, I think it's probably a season to soon for him, and I really don't see someone like Carberry coming in as that would go against what this England team want to do by building for the future.  I just can't see any of the top 3 being told to make way for someone new.  Strauss isn't even playing badly right now, he just seems to be making bad decisions that gets him out.

I would hand a new cap out at 6 and maybe say to KP, look you've been at the IPL, play a couple of championship matches for Surrey to get back into the longer format of the game and we'll see you for SA.
Logged

stevat

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 606
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #183 on: April 04, 2012, 11:52:18 PM »

Ben Stokes is almost certain to be there or thereabouts if he can avoid injury this season, at least for the ODI team.  Test cricket probably too far at the minute, but he is a fantastic talent.
Logged

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #184 on: April 05, 2012, 05:56:36 AM »

Cook was all set for his 20th Test hundred and he fully deserved it! Unlucky!!  >:( >:(
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #185 on: April 05, 2012, 08:41:21 AM »

All kicking off here could be fun
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Nickauger

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3521
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #186 on: April 05, 2012, 08:43:02 AM »

What a knock!
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #187 on: April 05, 2012, 08:44:47 AM »

Are the commentators blind as they are saying he did not switch hands for the 100 but his left hand was at bottom so he switched
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

StandUpKeeps

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 241
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • 'Confidence Is The Key In Cricket'
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #188 on: April 05, 2012, 08:47:58 AM »

Are the commentators blind as they are saying he did not switch hands for the 100 but his left hand was at bottom so he switched
Exactly What I Thought :/
Logged

Red Ink Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3294
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Red Ink Cricket
    • Red Ink Cricket
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #189 on: April 05, 2012, 08:50:06 AM »

switch hit is fine. dont know why dilshan pulls up. get on with it!

good to see the top order firing. been so long since that last happened. 450-500 before the end of the day? with plenty of wickets in hand no reason we cant up the rate a bit. then gives us 2 days to bowl them out.
Logged
www.redinkcricket.co.uk
John@redinkcricket.co.uk
@red_inker

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #190 on: April 05, 2012, 08:50:16 AM »

Disgraceful for me if it's right and umps have warned him for time wasting as he is not stopping play dilshan is by not bowling

There is no rule against switch hit so umps on field should not be allowed to stop a batsmen playing a shot unless it's against rules as if this is the case the reverse sweep should be banned as its a switch hit with less power
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

steyn92

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 181
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #191 on: April 05, 2012, 08:56:09 AM »

A bigger concern is bell can't score a run to save his life atm..
Logged

PedalsMcgrew

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2154
  • Trade Count: (+4)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #192 on: April 05, 2012, 08:56:53 AM »

Wonder why Bell is trudging off smiling to himself as if he has just been the victim of the greatest catch ever seen? You hit it straight at him at shoulder height!
Logged
Lisa: How's my Rabbit?
Bart: He's dead and dad buried him in the garden, although not in that order..

Red Ink Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3294
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Red Ink Cricket
    • Red Ink Cricket
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #193 on: April 05, 2012, 08:57:07 AM »

but now hes gone it gives prior the chance to come in and score at a decent rate.
Logged
www.redinkcricket.co.uk
John@redinkcricket.co.uk
@red_inker

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England In Sri Lanka
« Reply #194 on: April 05, 2012, 08:57:28 AM »

Bell out so sorted that ;)

A mate just put this on twitter

 Dilshan who plays the DIL-SCOOP is unhappy with someone entertaining the crowd and playing an unorthodox shot ... hmmm!!!
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15
 

Advertise on CBF