Lets face it its a stupid game. Any game where the team you are playing against gets to make all the important decisions for your team is liable to abuse. Most players are fair but you only need one biased idiot to spoil a good match. Played a games some years ago for my village side and bowled their batsman only for the umpire to say not out because the keeper had knocked the bails off. This was complete rubbish, we appealed to square leg about this but he said he wasn't looking. Told the skipper to get someone else to finish the over as if we weren't counting bowled what was the point. Laughable!
I hope this wasn't Newark evening league cos I could have been that umpire, suggesting the umpire was changed makes me think it wasn't cos that didn't happen.
The hardest moment I've had whilst umpiring came and I acted how I thought was genuine at the time.
Bowler was slow/medium at a push. Keeper stood up, sharp enough. Ball goes very close to Off Peg, within a split second keeper has taken the ball and also gone for the bails, the ball then spills.
Now I had no idea if this had hit off stump or keeper had whipped bails off, I said this to the bowler who said that he also did not know. I asked the square leg umpire if he had seen the ball pass the stumps but he hadn't a clue.
I said to the bowler I can't be sure so I had to go in the batsmans favour. Not cos he was on my team but because the bowler always has another ball to try get him out.
The bowler understood, then accused our team of cheating several overs later when I had swapped umpires (naturally not from this decision)
Played there again last year, hit biggest 6 I've ever seen in league cricket
I still feel I acted right, or at least followed my instincts, and didn't hate the situation till after. Have since learn to score well so only umpire when need to, not that I could imagine a case like this happens often.