Are nets required or just a luxury??
Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Are nets required or just a luxury??  (Read 2351 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10678
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: Are nets required or just a luxury??
« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2012, 12:43:37 AM »

To be fair, as a bowler going to nets, you should be taking the opportunity to bowl the same ball consistently and repeatedly. This can be done at any nets session.
Logged

Vitas Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6625
  • Trade Count: (+20)
  • Cricket Retailer & Coaching Centre in Peterborough
    • Vitas Cricket
Re: Are nets required or just a luxury??
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2012, 01:11:59 AM »

Nets can familiarise bad habits as well as good. Sloppy/lazy technique when batting and my pet hate, bowlers no balling.

You need to have an objective, not just aimlessly bowling or aimlessly having a whack.

I try to work on specific weak areas of my game over the winter with the bowling machine (this year it's the short ball) and any club nets with real bowlers I treat like an innings, ie I value my wicket, I leave the ball, I punish the bad ball but I don't try to murder everything.

As the season approaches and then in the season itself I tend to just use the machine to keep my eye in rather than work on anything in particular, unless I identify a flaw that I've either not ironed out in the winter or have developed in the summer. Over thinking/analyzing the mechanics of batting (unless something is seriously wrong) usually just causes more issues.

Bowling wise I can't help much as I'm a gloveman. But please don't no ball, or bring your special shiny ball that hoops round corners! I'm not using a wider bat or playing in front of smaller stumps!  ;)

In short, I don't think they are required, they are a luxury. I didn't net regularly before vitas cricket existed, and didn't suffer too badly for it. However from a team perspective, I think everyone needs to train together.
From a personal viewpoint, unless you go into a net with a specific objective (ie don't carelessly no ball or aimlessly dig everything in short, and also don't try to cream everything with the bat) netting can do more harm than good, by encouraging bad habits and endorsing lazy technique etc.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2012, 01:17:01 AM by VitasCricket »
Logged

moonball

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 195
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Pitch it up, get your reward.
Re: Are nets required or just a luxury??
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2012, 01:46:45 AM »

Nets - indoor or outdoor - are a very personal thing. They can help technique, great with the bowling machine - you get to repeat actions / shots (muscle memory) - can get your feet moving again and provide practice in the winter that wouldn't be otherwise available. Great for getting the lads together again - we net end of Jan to end of March, good for juniors & seniors I find.

As I have managed to get our indoor nets sponsored this year - 10 x sessions at the cost of £880.00 - it's not a luxury as such...

As VitasCricket has suggested, you can work on weaknesses, get your feet moving and just get back "into it". You do need to net on grass, against real bowlers on "sticky dogs" - more akin to conditions last year certainly. Some guys love the indoor nets, some loathe it - down to the player. Using a coaching mat, etc., can help juniors and they enjoy it for sure.

In conclusion, for many (especially those learning the game or less able cricketers), it can be very much required. And great for getting back into the swing of things, knocking one's new bat in, etc.
Logged

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Are nets required or just a luxury??
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2012, 04:03:20 PM »

So to sum up most people seem to actually air on the side of the old player.

My response to him when he said it was 'if it wasn't a good thing Pro's wouldn't net every day'.

I can only go off my experience but I'd be a far far far worse player without having spent hours training. I saw a massive jump in stats from 2009 to the 2011 season.. jump in stats against from 2011 to 2012. I expect 2013 stats to be even better.

Anyway, cheers for the opinions guys. Feels like I'm a bit on my own on this one but I'll continue to net hard and regularly.
Logged

thecord

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1981
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Are nets required or just a luxury??
« Reply #19 on: December 29, 2012, 05:12:38 PM »

I don't think you are on your own at all mate. I think everyone is just saying that each session should have clear aims rather than just going in for a hit or chucking down a different ball every time you bowl  :)
Logged

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Are nets required or just a luxury??
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2012, 05:27:02 PM »

Agree with the aims/objective based training, that's something I've incorporated this winter.
Logged

pacman75cricket

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1408
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Are nets required or just a luxury??
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2012, 05:44:24 PM »

Players need to take responsibility.

Lots just go in for a whack.

How do we approach our batting in nets I personally try for a tight solid technique e.g playing straight, but sometimes I may feel that i need to get hands going through the ball so will bat out of crease & try to hit straight.

Many others just moo it.

Would I personally do without nets.  NO
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF