I'm giving up discussing Bell. No one questions how good he looks or that he has great technique. The questions are around his mental toughness which he rarely displays when you need it (unlike Trott, Cook, Collingwood etc etc). He'll generally score his runs when others have and rarely score when it's really needed (which is when you need your 'stars' to stand up and be counted). The Aussie side picked up on it really quickly and destroyed him mentally as well as cricket wise, so we should all know it's there.
I think we should put Bell discussions (and Broad really) to bed as roughly half want Bell to stay and half want him dropped. Probably the same with Broad. That's my last comment on Bell, feel free to answer and have your say but I'll not be commenting further as he's basically like marmite. You either love him purely because of how he looks technique wise or you don't doubt how pretty he is to watch but doubt him mentally. Neither side will change and neither side will agree.Compton's done nothing wrong but due to Roots rise in stock (unproven really at test level) he's under pressure to perform. I personally don't think he's done anything to warrant dropping from the next few ashes series and keep root at six but that's just me.
I'm happy to put it to bed as well so here is my final response.
Bell is often made the scapegoat when England are failing (particularly on this forum it seems), in the same way that people keep moaning about Trott in ODIs. Bell has spent most of his career at 5 or 6 in an England team that has risen to number 1 in the world and won back to back Ashes for the first time in my lifetime. He has spent a lot of that time coming in behind three of Englands top 6 most hundered makers so its not surprising that a lot of the time when he scores runs somebody in front of him will already have got a hundred. Bell helped secure a draw in the last game of the series in India and people on here moaned about him making a hundred just because Trott scored a hundred as well . If Trott had scored 99 or 72 would Bell's innings have then be deemed worthy? Basically because trott got a hundred you are saying that Bell's effort is devalued because of this yet Trott's effort is not devalued because Bell came afterwards.
In their last 35 innings Trott has averaged 35 with 2 hundreds whilst Bell averages 51 with 4 hundreds yet nobody has ever suggested that Trott should be dropped because he is perceived as dependable while Bell is presumed to be flakey.
Is Bell going to go down as one of England's greatest ever test batsman like Cook looks like he will? Probably not
Is Bell a damn fine test batsman who is one of the 6 best batsman in England right now? Unquestionably yes
Given the thrashings that the Lions took over in Aus recently I wouldn't say that plenty of people are breathing down his neck at the moment. I want to see Bairstow in the side at somepoint but there is no way that he should be playing in front of Bell at the moment. If he struggles over the course of the two ashes series then maybe you can say we could look at bringing Jonny in but the same should also be said of Trott if he struggles as well.
In summary Bell is a good player in good form over the last 2 to 3 years and is one of Englands best 6 batsman right now which is why he is in the team and why he should stay.