Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Decent wicket keeping inners?  (Read 10325 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Red Ink Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3293
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Red Ink Cricket
    • Red Ink Cricket
Re: Decent wicket keeping inners?
« Reply #15 on: May 07, 2013, 08:36:59 PM »

I ordered some bits from morrant and the service was rubbish so they gave me a free pair of cotton inners. Nice but a little thin. I've bulked them up with the aero catching gloves over the top and love them. Extra padding on the palm area but nothing too bulky around the fingers.
Logged
www.redinkcricket.co.uk
John@redinkcricket.co.uk
@red_inker

richthekeeper

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 950
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Decent wicket keeping inners?
« Reply #16 on: July 23, 2013, 02:44:12 PM »

I'm in the market for some new inners and I'm really keen to get ones with a full chamois thumb.

I prefer the normal half chamois inners but find I usually end up with the thumb twisted so it's half mesh, half chamois. Can be quite sore!

Anyone?
Logged

magicman84

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 43
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Decent wicket keeping inners?
« Reply #17 on: July 23, 2013, 03:00:47 PM »

Rich, try the Aero catching gloves.
Logged

lukemannionzimbabwe

  • Colts
  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 332
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Decent wicket keeping inners?
« Reply #18 on: July 23, 2013, 04:31:07 PM »

Rich, also try the puma full chamois inners
Logged
🇿🇼

Philip@Aero

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 122
  • Trade Count: (0)
    • Aero Cricket
Re: Decent wicket keeping inners?
« Reply #19 on: July 30, 2013, 11:56:22 PM »

Has anyone used the Aero P2s before? http://www.itsjustcricket.co.uk/wicket-keeping-c11/senior-wicket-keeping-c12/aero-p2-kpr-wicket-keeping-inners-p16

These look pretty good to me, but the P1s have actually outsold them by about 20:1 (at least in our experience).  Just curious to know how they're that much inferior to the P1s??!!
The P1s use a higher quantity of materials plus have Velco wrist securing rather than the P2's elasticated wrists.  The P1s have more segemented protective sections whereas the P2s use larger sections of protective foam.  Quality wise the P2 is designed to be as good as anything else on the market and as usual the P1 is out there!

This is a picture of the P1s


And here are the P2s


Logged
All you need to know about Aero cricket
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF