Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: GM's Perform?  (Read 5707 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bigboy

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2013, 11:50:09 PM »

400 pounds is still high 600 aus $$, why would you risk it for another 50-100 on a bat you can't feel? plus you support aussie jobs. And for the record GM bats are pressed quite hard.
Logged

Wickets-then-runs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 730
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #16 on: July 22, 2013, 02:57:27 AM »

400 pounds is still high 600 aus $$, why would you risk it for another 50-100 on a bat you can't feel? plus you support aussie jobs. And for the record GM bats are pressed quite hard.
I have bought several bats from Julian Millichamp and have enjoyed the experience. I also bought a Bradbury Players ($675) model which had a middle the size of a Neutron and was hard as a rock. I took it back to Chappells and they agreed with me and sent it back to Bradbury who promptly denied any responsibility. I had a similar experience with an M&H and they replaced the bat no questions asked. My money, my choice.
Logged

bigboy

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2013, 08:09:59 AM »

Of course it's your choice but if you're doing it only to save a few bucks it's not a very well informed one. The Watson bats are softer than most of their stock bats for the record, big profiled high middled bats.
Logged

Wickets-then-runs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 730
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2013, 08:33:41 AM »

Of course it's your choice but if you're doing it only to save a few bucks it's not a very well informed one. The Watson bats are softer than most of their stock bats for the record, big profiled high middled bats.
Thanks mate, that's the sort of info I was after as I have found most GM's are pretty hard.  :)
Logged

mr_wickets

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 256
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2013, 09:04:31 AM »

I've found GM's top be pretty hit or miss. Either an amazing bat that flies and looks great or looks great but isn't a great performer. The profiles look nice and the grain looks good, however sometimes they don't 'go'. If I were you, I'd go and have a look and knock a ball up on one rather than importing it.
Logged

Wickets-then-runs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 730
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #20 on: July 22, 2013, 09:17:52 AM »

I've found GM's top be pretty hit or miss. Either an amazing bat that flies and looks great or looks great but isn't a great performer. The profiles look nice and the grain looks good, however sometimes they don't 'go'. If I were you, I'd go and have a look and knock a ball up on one rather than importing it.
Yeah, seems to be a recurring theme here...  ;)
Logged

Lefty100

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #21 on: July 25, 2013, 08:25:16 PM »

I've had an
(i) Apex 505 (2.9) - a good small middle but off-middle it was like a door and sent severe vibrations up your arm - it never opened up further. 
(ii) Icon 808 (2.8) - very good bat from the start, beautiful pick up, good sized middle and fairly user-friendly on off-centre hits (sorry I'm more of a tennis player so my descriptions might reveal this but my sons are cricket mad so I got more into it with them) - it definitely opened up over time.
(iii) Halo Original LE (2.7) - unbelievable bat, part of a batch that came to Australia that were quite light yet had thicker shoulders and toe than the norm. Played beautifully fro the start, a total dream of a bat - all that have had a go with it agree. It was much softer pressed than the other two and basically felt fully open from the start.



 

Logged

stevat

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 606
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #22 on: July 25, 2013, 09:27:05 PM »

So you get what you pay for eh?

That said, there are some fantastic sticks at 606 level, saw a guy with a light Icon a year ago that played as well as any bat I've seen.  Wavy grains, heartwood and some graping, but it flew out of the screws.
Logged

Lefty100

  • Village Cricketer
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #23 on: July 25, 2013, 10:05:33 PM »

Maybe not always it was not my experience with these bats - the Icon 808 was very good and probably for price relative to performance was better value for money than the Halo.
Logged

mohawks94

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 878
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #24 on: August 02, 2013, 07:24:25 PM »

I had a Flare Original for about 6 weeks and it was a lovely bat! I have also tried the zona, argon and icon f2, but whilst they were nice, I don't like the flat face, but the zona certainly performed well, the icon was solid all round, but the argon felt like it needed a couple of grips because it had quite a thin handle, may just have been that one though
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12679
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #25 on: August 02, 2013, 07:32:05 PM »

I may have one arriving in a day or too thanks to Mr Stig, I will let you know how it goes...!
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #26 on: August 02, 2013, 08:37:01 PM »

I bought an 808 zona from here. Seems to already have opened up and goes like a gun!

I only bought it as I wanted to own a flat faced bat, and expected not to use it, but it's actually a great bat.

It's joined my kit bag with my b3 and kahuna. 2nd b3 is retired to the shed because!
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

i12breakfree

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2291
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #27 on: August 02, 2013, 08:42:31 PM »

Received a GM 606 argon F2 this week
Massive bat and already pings great
Logged

jamferg

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 801
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #28 on: August 02, 2013, 08:57:23 PM »

Wasn't there a member on here who was working at G&M and was asked to press bats with little training or experience? Said that he was pressing all grades at a standard press.
Logged
Top score: 138*
Best Bowling 9-65

Wickets-then-runs

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 730
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: GM's Perform?
« Reply #29 on: August 03, 2013, 05:49:44 AM »

I may have one arriving in a day or too thanks to Mr Stig, I will let you know how it goes...!
Thanks mate! I went ahead and bought one and must say the middle is quite lovely and long. The toe is quite hard which I suppose is what GM is after but overall, very happy so far!
I've also just got M&H Master back from having TAS inserts fitted and all I can say is...... WOW! More on that later....
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF