Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Keeping without pads-would you?  (Read 11290 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: Keeping without pads-would you?
« Reply #30 on: September 14, 2014, 09:54:10 PM »

I personally would rather stand back with one glove and have a shy when the batsman sets off than stand up and risk an errant delivery going for even more runs. I appreciate it won't work for everyone, but one hand to take the ball and the gloveless one to throw down the stumps has worked for me in the past.
I struggle enough to catch it wearing dinner plate sized gloves with webbing and a sticky surface, so I wouldn't make it more difficult for myself if I could help it  :D
Logged

Nato

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 176
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Back in the saddle...
Re: Keeping without pads-would you?
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2014, 09:54:49 PM »


I struggle enough to catch it wearing dinner plate sized gloves with webbing and a sticky surface, so I wouldn't make it more difficult for myself if I could help it  :D

Lmao!!
Logged
Pontymister 2nd XI
Glamorgan & Monmouthshire Division 3 Champions 2013

mdg20

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 542
  • Trade Count: (0)
    • Walthamstow CC
Re: Keeping without pads-would you?
« Reply #32 on: September 14, 2014, 10:02:36 PM »

I personally would rather stand back with one glove and have a shy when the batsman sets off than stand up and risk an errant delivery going for even more runs. I appreciate it won't work for everyone, but one hand to take the ball and the gloveless one to throw down the stumps has worked for me in the past.

if it really is the case of needing to prevent even the odd bye going through then stand up and don't give them even a chance of running. If its fired down the legside and you miss it, that's the bowlers fault not yours.
Even with the glove off, you still need to take it cleanly and then hit the stumps. Realistically you aren't going to do that every time.
Logged

Nato

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 176
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Back in the saddle...
Re: Keeping without pads-would you?
« Reply #33 on: September 14, 2014, 10:05:37 PM »

But you're giving yourself a better chance standing back, even with one glove, of doing that, than standing up. At least this is my experience of keeping at the death anyway. That's why we love this job, we all do it in slightly different ways :)
Logged
Pontymister 2nd XI
Glamorgan & Monmouthshire Division 3 Champions 2013

mdg20

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 542
  • Trade Count: (0)
    • Walthamstow CC
Re: Keeping without pads-would you?
« Reply #34 on: September 15, 2014, 12:03:29 AM »

But you're giving yourself a better chance standing back, even with one glove, of doing that, than standing up. At least this is my experience of keeping at the death anyway. That's why we love this job, we all do it in slightly different ways :)

There is no chance if you stand up - as they cant/wont run.
Logged

Damo

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 83
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Keeping without pads-would you?
« Reply #35 on: September 15, 2014, 08:16:38 PM »

if you back yourself and the bowler my thoughts are stand up, if stood back i would still wear both gloves and underarm at the stumps, on a lot of pitches i play on you do on occasion get some that shoot or fizz i dont fancy stopping them with only one glove on even more so if one goes down leg, but it also depends on what the batsman is or is not doing, every situation is different, confidence counts for a lot,
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 

Advertise on CBF