On the actual topic of youtube cricket reviews, I'm more of a fan of the GCC videos - shorter, to the point, give you the information you need and an opinion on the product without any of the sales "you can buy it here for 134.67" etc. More professional too with a fixed camera etc. Yes they're less comprehensive, but the standard of cricket YT reviews on the whole isn't high, so short and sweet is good for me.
I'll probably watch the IJC video if there is one on an item I'm thinking of buying, but if I'm being harsh they're very rambling and the off the cuff style/editing isn't great - always a long monologue and too frequently the camera isn't sure whether to point at the presenter or the product. Cricket reviews are a big contrast with the very popular world of YT vape reviewers (using an example I watch a lot of), where there's a very set format used by most - introduce the item being reviewed, closeup shots with all the details/features, then reviewer's opinions and usually a comparison against competing items. Vape reviewers are 90% private individuals with no sales agenda though which helps of course with removing some of the bias and also driving up the professionalism as they're competing with other reviewers, don't think we'll ever see that kind of independent reviewing in cricket though sadly. Although there's no reason why not!