Cricket's cartel
Advertise on CBF

Author Topic: Cricket's cartel  (Read 3282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Cricket's cartel
« on: January 19, 2014, 12:03:04 PM »

Has anyone seen the scoop on cricinfo about the new deal between England, India and Australia?
It essentially amounts to the creation of an oligarchy where the three boards will run cricket as they see fit to their financial gain and to the detriment of everyone else – from Test no.1 team South Africa to Papua New Guinea and Norway.

The main plans can be summarised as follows:

New executive committee (ExCo) to be set up with permanent memberships for BCCI, CA, ECB, to override all other committees
Promotion and relegation in Test cricket, with exceptions made in the cases of BCCI, CA, ECB
ICC to be delinked from FTP arrangements, with bilateral agreements only taking over
New finance model of ICC revenue distribution
Key positions in ICC - ICC chairman, chairmen of ExCo and finance & commerial affairs committee - to be nominees of BCCI-CA-ECB
Reinstatement of Champions Trophy in 2017 and 2021 in place of the World Test Championship


On the plus side, eng, ind,and Aus will make a shed load of the cash. Hurrah!
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2014, 12:26:13 PM »

Its no worse than the current cartel which basically rubber stamps anything that suits the BCCI!
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

cesare_in

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 372
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2014, 12:28:08 PM »

So are they saying to others- you bring the $$$ and we shall consider including you in the plan for touring your country?
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2014, 12:29:49 PM »

more or less that, yes.

personally I think its the first step on the route to a two tier test system, with the big three plus South Africa (if they de-Lorgat themselves) and maybe Sri LAnka in the top tier and PAkistan, New Zealand, the Windies, BAngladesh, Zimbokland and maybe Afghanistan and Ireland in the B-League.
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Cedrictoad

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 513
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2014, 12:32:38 PM »

I think whether this is a good thing will depend on how much influence CA and ECB will have.  Previously the BCCI seemed to wield all the power.  Therefore, if this arrangement allows CA and the ECB to blunt the BCCI's power then it has got to be a good thing.

You would think that the South African cricket body would have been included in this little gang...
Logged

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2014, 12:33:24 PM »

They don't have the commercial reach.

The removal of the FTP is a real worry.
Logged

Cedrictoad

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 513
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2014, 12:37:13 PM »

I must admit to being a bit ignorant in relation to how the FTP is run.  Why is this such a concern?
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2014, 12:45:55 PM »

SA would probably have been involved were it not for the fact that they refuse to sack HArron Lorgat, who is the BCCI's public enemy number one...
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2014, 12:46:53 PM »

I must admit to being a bit ignorant in relation to how the FTP is run.  Why is this such a concern?

how are countries like Bangladesh, NZ and Sri Lanka to make money or even maintain a functioning international set up without the  assurance of some game time against hte top opposition?
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Cedrictoad

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 513
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2014, 12:48:15 PM »

So the FTP requires the "rich" countries to tour the "poor" countries every few years or so?
Logged

Manormanic

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6758
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2014, 12:50:55 PM »

it requires all Test nations to play a given number of tests (3) and ODIs (5) over an eight year period.
Logged
"to be the man, you've got to beat the man"

Alvaro

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6322
  • Trade Count: (+3)
Re: Cricket's cartel
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2014, 07:54:16 PM »

These proposals have now gone through.

Reading below the line on a Vic Marks blog I came across this post, which is eloquent and sums my feelings up. Outside of India cricket is a dying game. Do the ecb, ca, and bcci realise this and are making their money now?

Re KP et al:

I don't see this as "short-term public outcry". For me, this week has simply been the culmination of a decade-long process of dislocation between England's cricket team and its supporters. I'm afraid that for me that process is now complete. Neatly, it began with the sell-off to Sky and ended with this.

I feel no residual loyalty to England's cricket team whatsoever. I feel like I'm being asked to support a corporate entity, not a sporting XI. The way in which this affair has been handled simply reinforced that feeling. The prospect of the ICC being run by the big three boards simply confirms that things will get worse. The unerring trend of the mainstream print and broadcast media to reflect the views of the ECB before they even consider fans just compounds the offence.

Between now and next year's World Cup England will play only seven Tests, all of them at home. Not only that, but the schedule is a repeat of 2011 (only with one more Test for India and one fewer for Sri Lanka). Not only that, but the Test schedule for the first summer after the World Cup is a full repeat of the summer just passed. Why the bloody hell should I stay interested in this sport, even as a self-confessed "Test cricket tragic"? What are the grounds for optimism, when the FTP is already being mucked up so that England, Australia and India can play themselves more frequently, usually in ODIs, and that process has just been effectively hastened and rubberstamped by a bunch of visionless, venal cowards?
Damn right I'm upset about not being able to watch Pietersen play for England any more. But in the end it's a symptom of a much larger malaise which I now believe to be terminal. These are the dark ages. You're welcome to them.
Logged

13th Man

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 210
  • Trade Count: (0)
Better for NZ
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2014, 12:20:54 AM »

Martin Sneddon NZ board member says changes will provide financial boost for NZ cricket. 

Personally it already feels like there are 2 divisions operating in cricket.  Can't remember the last time I watched a test between Aust. V W.I, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh?  NZ is different there is always rivalry.
Logged
 

Advertise on CBF