I Presume Woakes will be missing out. Ballance in the role of 3 will interesting to see, didn't score many in his 1 test, but I remember him getting a jaffa in the 1st innings.
Could just be to keep the left hand - right hand thing going?
Surely a professional team selection committee are smart enough to realise that the only combination they can control with a fixed order in that case is the opening pair...
I guess we wait and see how he gets on, but gut instinct is that Ballance at 3 is wrong. I'd have gone with Bell personally, though I could see merit in Root batting there too, but Ballance? It's a notoriously hard spot to fill and for me isn't the place you should be cutting your test match teeth
the weird thing is, most Test players bat three for their counties save where other international calibre players prevent it (Root, Bell, Trott, Ali and, going back in time, Hick, Ramps, Lamb, Smith, Gower) wich makes it even more odd that the one guy who has never done so is given the task!
I wonder whether his ability as a shot maker has influenced the decision given that Cook, Robson, Root may deliver turgid starts. It's a brave choice and I can see the fuzzy logic behind it.