Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Umpiring decisions...  (Read 2641 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

golden duck

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 220
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Umpiring decisions...
« Reply #15 on: June 16, 2014, 11:29:06 AM »

I thought it was a no ball if the fielder had pads on the outside of his whites?

I thought only the keeper was allowed to do this.

Tim: Does the umpire have to call dead ball before the catch is taken?

From memory (might be wrong) , dead ball is in effect from the moment the umpire 'thinks' it, with the onus being on saying & signalling as soon as possible.  This allows the upmire to pull the game up before too much happens (should there be an injury or some such)
Logged

richthekeeper

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 950
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: Umpiring decisions...
« Reply #16 on: June 16, 2014, 11:51:34 AM »

although i know the rule on the ball striking a fielder's helmet, it's my opinion that this rule shouldn't apply to wicket keepers. these days the helmet is absolutely part of the keeper's normal kit, with under 18s being required to wear them by law.

therefore a ball edged onto the keeper's lid and subsequently caught should really be out.
Logged

pie-man

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Umpiring decisions...
« Reply #17 on: June 16, 2014, 11:57:57 AM »

although i know the rule on the ball striking a fielder's helmet, it's my opinion that this rule shouldn't apply to wicket keepers. these days the helmet is absolutely part of the keeper's normal kit, with under 18s being required to wear them by law.

therefore a ball edged onto the keeper's lid and subsequently caught should really be out.
Agreed.  If its a rule that a keeper (of a certain age) must wear a helmet, then of course that's his normal attire.
Logged

pie-man

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: Umpiring decisions...
« Reply #18 on: June 16, 2014, 11:59:19 AM »

If the fielder (other than wicketkeeper) wears the pads outside his trousers, then the same applies for that as well. But if it is worn inside the trousers, then you can be out caught.

shoes, shirt, pants, cap/hat will constitute part of his normal attire

Cant say Ive ever seen short leg with pads on the outside!
Logged

mini998

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 422
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Umpiring decisions...
« Reply #19 on: June 16, 2014, 12:24:06 PM »

As far as I know only keeper is allowed to wear protective equipment outside the cloths by law.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
 

Advertise on CBF