Topic: A non reject Pro Bat (Read 20700 times)

19reading87 · « **Reply #30 on:** April 19, 2016, 09:15:14 PM »

I read on Twitter that Dent got his kit robbed from his car so would explain using an adidas

Alvaro · « **Reply #31 on:** April 19, 2016, 09:19:05 PM »

Quote from: nwillam12 on April 19, 2016, 07:14:19 PM

I believe that was one of Benny Howell's mate.

Cheers. Shame GN have flicked benny.

Kulli · « **Reply #32 on:** April 20, 2016, 06:29:55 AM »

Here's a few hastily snapped pics

Profile, can someone confirm if it's a regular Octane shape?

Not quite only a face a mother could love, but an unusual one, couple of big wide heartwood grains on the outside edge followed by some very tight grains across the middle, I counted around 17 in total.

Few surface cracks needing repairing but otherwise she's in good condition, big for the weight and goes as well as anything else I own. Bargain for under �100.

liscon12 · « **Reply #33 on:** April 20, 2016, 07:41:04 AM »

Is it just me or can anyone else not see the pictures?

smilley792 · « **Reply #34 on:** April 20, 2016, 08:03:33 AM »

Quote from: liscon12 on April 20, 2016, 07:41:04 AM

Is it just me or can anyone else not see the pictures?

Just you.

smilley792 · « **Reply #35 on:** April 20, 2016, 08:06:55 AM »

I don't have a profile shot of my octane but the peak of the spine rises sharper then drops quickly.

Yours definately seems a different shape.

liscon12 · « **Reply #36 on:** April 20, 2016, 08:07:30 AM »

Turns out its my works web filtering that is blocking the pics for some weird reason.

King pair · « **Reply #37 on:** April 20, 2016, 08:22:04 AM »

Quote from: smilley792 on April 20, 2016, 08:06:55 AM

I don't have a profile shot of my octane but the peak of the spine rises sharper then drops quickly.

Yours definately seems a different shape.

have to agree. looks different to a standard octane

Kulli · « **Reply #38 on:** April 20, 2016, 10:41:44 AM »

No number on the handle this time so can't find out what shape it is and who it was maid for from GM this time

Alvaro · « **Reply #39 on:** April 20, 2016, 11:44:40 AM »

Is it definItely a GM?

Kulli · « **Reply #40 on:** April 20, 2016, 11:55:56 AM »

The scuff sheet (and tape) were under the stickers so that made me presume so, only thing i wondered about is it has cork inserts instead of rubbert in the handle, but I know Gm do both, though though it was only cork in lower models?

No real way to confirm but all the usual signs (shoulders toe) etc point towards it being GM made, can post photos if anyone thinks they can tell for sure.

petehosk · « **Reply #41 on:** April 20, 2016, 12:16:41 PM »

Definitely non-Octanian by the profile pic!

Buzz · « **Reply #42 on:** April 20, 2016, 01:59:37 PM »

Looks like an older model GM, purist 2 vintage.

Kulli · « **Reply #43 on:** April 20, 2016, 02:14:08 PM »

It's a very similar shape to the Purist stickered Catalyst I posted earlier, will snap one of them together tonight if I remember.

Kulli · « **Reply #44 on:** April 22, 2016, 05:04:37 PM »

Some poorly taken photos suggest it's very similar in shape to the Gidman catalyst I got before, but the knob on the handle is markedly different so unless GM have hanged that over the years maybe it's stickered up, though GM do insist this doesn't happen.

Author Topic: A non reject Pro Bat (Read 20700 times)

19reading87

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

Alvaro

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

Kulli

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

liscon12

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

smilley792

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

smilley792

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

liscon12

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

King pair

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

Kulli

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

Alvaro

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

Kulli

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

petehosk

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

Buzz

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

Kulli

Re: A non reject Pro Bat

Kulli

Re: A non reject Pro Bat