Yep agree its a risk. Think its a few years off but does look like cricket is going to die a slow death, sad really
I do think there is a place for proper cricket (by that I mean test and draw amateur stuff), but.. but... it needs to be played from a young age. Then you wouldn't get the people growing up with biffing cricket moaning about it being 'boring'. Plus, it would raise the standard of the game long term as you wouldn't get less technically gifted players playing top order, bowling would have to improve to actually take wickets as well as just bowl tight etc
I think there is less life in short format games as so few of a team actually get a decent go. so in <40 overs you might only have teh top 4 get a decent bat, the rest have to slog most of the time.. bowlers restricted to x overs means that batsmen can bat on and on.. bowlers can't, which isn't fair as they then are paying more for less of a game. eventually people will get bored with 'just being a bowler'.. short formats have a place in teh world as it's great for spectators to see as it's fast but test cricket is not dead, it's just being priced out of most people's reach (so a lot of fans simply can't afford it and the rest refuse to pay skys extortionate subscription or ticket price).
The game needs to refocus on cricket and not run it as a business. if you cant afford to pay player x 100,000 a year.. then don't.. if he moves to another club who can, oh well. Southampton in football are a example that you can produce the talent easily enough if you put the effort in at the bottom.
anyway, the first people that need firing are the WICB and that players group. Then fine the players massively (if not ban all the IPL ones) and move on. Player power can't be allowed to develop but as we are seeing with these, the BCCI and ECB... suits who have no interest in the game can't be in charge either. Their focus is on themselves, their pay packet and their pensions