Is that why noone from the overrated County Championship has matched Andy Flower's Test average in the last 10+ years?
Graeme Smith must of been a terrible test cricketer then as he only averaged 48 compared to Andy Flower's 51. Does that make the SA FC structure weaker as well?
My whole point here is your use of selective statistics to a sample size of one to fabricate something that simply isn't true. Why didn't you compare test averages for all players in both first class structures before taking that amazing leap?. Most likely because it wouldn't suit your arguments, even if it was the most rational thing to do. If you have a remotely plausible argument I am yet to hear it.