i can see why those might be "some" parameters for what may constitute a "proper" test match.
but it doesn't leave any room for india vs australia in eden gardens in 2001...headingley '81, india vs south africa at J'burg 2013, australia vs wi in 98, wi vs australia in '93 (Adelaide i think)...thats just a few off the top of my head.
i would humbly and politely suggest there is more than 1 set of guidelines for "proper" test cricket, tho i am able to see the merits of what you say.
i thought it was quite a good contest in Mohali. Yes the wicket was a dust bowl and favoured india. but thats the point. i thought it was good of india to at least provide a result wicket rather than a run fest. ALL the batsmen struggled. its a "better" test wicket than abu dhabi or dubai, and even they produced reasonable tests last month. not the greatest, but there was still competition, and thats what i watch test cricket for - not just the individual performances, but the competition, the struggle, 22 players, 15 sessions, 90 x 6 x 5 deliveries, roughly 400ms per delivery and maybe few seconds per delivery while the ball is in play...but i could still sit there all day and watch it...
the debates about what sorts of surfaces should be prepared will always run and run, and let it. there should be no one standard, as this would in my opinion dilute the virtues of test cricket - the variability and adapting to conditions is part of the test.
thanks
raj