Advertise on CBF

Poll

Choose one option?

XP80
- 22 (25.9%)
50+
- 21 (24.7%)
Warner's
- 15 (17.6%)
Neither
- 11 (12.9%)
Be Snoop Dogg and invest in weed
- 16 (18.8%)

Total Members Voted: 83

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's  (Read 8640 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Batbuddy99

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 925
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • https://royalascotcc.co.uk
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #15 on: April 06, 2016, 10:33:14 AM »

According to the GCCC website the xp80 will be available in 2lb9oz!!!
Logged
Still working on turning massive netting potential into real match runs

Leno

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 80
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #16 on: April 06, 2016, 11:37:47 AM »

I'm going to have to get our overseas to get the xp80 for me
Logged

Churchy1989

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1525
  • Trade Count: (+1)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #17 on: April 06, 2016, 11:38:00 AM »

They look rather heavy....2:14 ish
Logged
Insta / Twitter @Church_Cricket

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #18 on: April 06, 2016, 11:52:03 AM »

According to the GCCC website the xp80 will be available in 2lb9oz!!!

80mm spine  and 2lb9

I hope it has 40mm edges and a full profile!
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 12:01:35 PM by WalkingWicket37 »
Logged

raza147

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 211
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2016, 11:55:53 AM »

must be very overdried to get it to that weight
Logged

dilscoop

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 445
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #20 on: June 01, 2016, 08:07:59 AM »

So who fancies buying all 3 and letting us get them mapped by B3? haha

1 down
2 to go
Logged

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9707
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #21 on: June 01, 2016, 08:29:44 AM »

They just don't do it for me - massive bats and all that, but the middle seems ridiculously high, as do the prices.

I'm sure I'd do the toe on one of these with my dicky timing on my stodgy UK tracks.

And the branding on the Kaboom is hideous.
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

dilscoop

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 445
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #22 on: June 01, 2016, 08:32:36 AM »

They just don't do it for me - massive bats and all that, but the middle seems ridiculously high, as do the prices.

I'm sure I'd do the toe on one of these with my dicky timing on my stodgy UK tracks.

And the branding on the Kaboom is hideous.

Its all a experience
Logged

dilscoop

  • County 2nd XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 445
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #23 on: June 01, 2016, 08:33:25 AM »

Voting is very close, we need a winner
First to 20 wins
Logged

Ams4287

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1452
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #24 on: June 01, 2016, 09:13:04 AM »

Buy the XP80 to compare vs the M&H distinction - oh and after some of your posts keep out of the sun
Logged

FattusCattus

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9707
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Bend it like Fattus!!
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #25 on: June 01, 2016, 10:17:36 AM »

Its all a experience

I believe the phrase you are looking for is "it's all an expense"  :)


Oh - and as Cleo McDowell once said - "stay off the drugs son!"
Logged
If you tolerate this, then your baked goods will be next.

shamelessshaun

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 254
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #26 on: June 01, 2016, 10:24:58 AM »

Drugs are bad, mmkay!
Logged

Red Ink Cricket

  • Forum Sponsor
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3293
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Red Ink Cricket
    • Red Ink Cricket
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #27 on: June 01, 2016, 10:26:04 AM »

I've got a couple of huge clefts in stock so am going to see what I can do in making replicas of these. They aren't overly light but will be interesting to see what can be made
Logged
www.redinkcricket.co.uk
John@redinkcricket.co.uk
@red_inker

Marc28

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 643
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #28 on: June 01, 2016, 10:55:17 AM »

I may sound like a party pooper
But should bats like this be legal.
I mean I play div 7 cricket if I came out with one of these
I would get slaughtered or do the slaughtering
But I do like the nostalgia of the 50+
Logged

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: XP80 vs 50+ vs Warner's
« Reply #29 on: June 01, 2016, 11:12:41 AM »

I may sound like a party pooper
But should bats like this be legal.
I mean I play div 7 cricket if I came out with one of these
I would get slaughtered or do the slaughtering
But I do like the nostalgia of the 50+

there's a Beastie boys video where the parent's return home at midnight and smash up the stereo system, breaking up the party.And that's just happened here.

 :)    yes they should be made illegal...now where is my tin hat?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
 

Advertise on CBF