Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 80

Author Topic: England vs Pakistan  (Read 114907 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #780 on: August 12, 2016, 08:12:29 AM »

Cook
Hales
Root
Ballance
Stokes
Bairstow
Ali
Woakes
Rashid
Broad
Anderson.


Bat to 9, 6 bowlers of which two spinners.

Or

Cook
Lyth
Root
Kp
Hales
Stokes
Bairstow
Ali
Rashid
Broad/woakes
Anderson.

Bat to ten with woakes in, 3 seamers, 2 spinners, and a test proven number 4...........

Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #781 on: August 12, 2016, 08:16:19 AM »

why is Woakes behind Rashid in these hypothetical teams?
Logged

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #782 on: August 12, 2016, 08:17:15 AM »

He should bat at 5. Definately a test match number 5.........

I'd be tempted to put Hales at 5 and get Stokes opening myself  ;)
Logged

GoodLeave

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1062
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #783 on: August 12, 2016, 08:32:03 AM »



Cook
Lyth
Root

Hales
Stokes
Bairstow
Ali
Rashid
Broad/woakes
Anderson.

Bat to ten with woakes in, 3 seamers, 2 spinners, and a test proven number 4...........

He who must not be named. Anyone know when he qualifies for SA? Would be interesting to see if he actually goes through with it.
Logged

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #784 on: August 12, 2016, 08:43:51 AM »

He who must not be named. Anyone know when he qualifies for SA? Would be interesting to see if he actually goes through with it.

Where would he get his Proteas tattoo? Would be a hell of a cover up job over the three lions  ;)
Logged

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #785 on: August 12, 2016, 08:48:43 AM »

Where would he get his Proteas tattoo? Would be a hell of a cover up job over the three lions  ;)

Channel four tattoo fixer-celebrity special.
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #786 on: August 12, 2016, 08:50:48 AM »

why is Woakes behind Rashid in these hypothetical teams?

In mine as im not sure who spinner is as maybe Rashid maybe someone else but they could swap for me
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Kieron_BT

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 983
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • WK - Millhouses Works CC - SYSCL
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #787 on: August 12, 2016, 08:57:56 AM »

No mention of Mark Wood in any of these teams?

His pace and reverse swing could be invaluable in the sub-continent to take the pitch out of the equation
Logged
Born To Play Cricket, Forced To Work. Love The Game.

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #788 on: August 12, 2016, 09:10:13 AM »

No mention of Mark Wood in any of these teams?

His pace and reverse swing could be invaluable in the sub-continent to take the pitch out of the equation

could he last 3 tests in a row though?
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #789 on: August 12, 2016, 09:20:03 AM »

Had we not been going to Bangladesh/India. Wood would be in for Rashid in my side. But as need that extra spinner, I'd be more inclined to leave him at home to continue his fitness recovery.


If your having 3 seamers two spinners it be 3 of Anderson/broad/woakes/stokes.

We know England won't drop Anderson and broad and woakes has done enough to stay in the side and well stokes bats. So, not sure where you put wood(cough instead of Ali cough)
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #790 on: August 12, 2016, 09:24:51 AM »

You can't drop Mo, he's just made 108(for 3) to save the innings ;)
Logged

smilley792

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8755
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Willoooowwwww
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #791 on: August 12, 2016, 09:25:36 AM »

Didn't drop him, just got a tickly throat.........
Logged
@chrisjones792
Fastest ton- 54balls

rickjames

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5094
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #792 on: August 12, 2016, 10:13:27 AM »

We can't get a good angle of a soft signal wicket, but perfect shot of a fly running into Broad's eye
Logged

WalkingWicket37

  • International Superstar
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12983
  • Trade Count: (+26)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #793 on: August 12, 2016, 10:34:19 AM »

We can't get a good angle of a soft signal wicket, but perfect shot of a fly running into Broad's eye

Priorities...
Logged

alexhilly1492

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3117
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: England vs Pakistan
« Reply #794 on: August 12, 2016, 11:19:44 AM »

would have liked to have seen hales catch that on the bounce and claim it, at least it would have been a little amusing... england need another couple before lunch while shafiq is new its the time to get him!!!
Logged
HS: 77*, 73*, 61*, 61*, 54*, 50*
BB: 7-4-9-5, 7.3-0-29-5
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 80
 

Advertise on CBF