Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8

Author Topic: Should bat regulations be updated?  (Read 26444 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

uknsaunders

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8656
  • Trade Count: (+4)
    • Farmers CC
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #30 on: July 12, 2016, 03:49:41 PM »

35mm edge and 60mm spine isn't going to challenge most batmakers. Get ready to see a load of bats with exactly the same full profile resulting in just as big a hitting zone. Oh and the bats will be lighter, resulting in quicker bat speed. Until they use a dukes ball in all first class cricket, produce bowler friendly decks and move the bloody boundaries back to where they were 20 years ago, nothing will change.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2016, 03:51:26 PM by uknsaunders »
Logged
email and googletalk: uknsaunders@gmail.com
club website: http://www.farmerscricketjersey.net/

OllieWalker39

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 262
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #31 on: July 12, 2016, 03:56:15 PM »

All valid points - perhaps we should just go ahead and ban variations, switch hits etc?!
Logged

edge

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4876
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #32 on: July 12, 2016, 04:12:13 PM »

Breaking news: the MCC have announced recommendations that Chris Gayle will be banned from all forms of cricket with immediate effect.

A weight limit would be a more interesting (also potentially more annoying) proposal than size limits. Unprecedented move though, surely if you're big and quick enough to use a 3lb bat then good luck to you.
Logged
HS: 156, BB: 7-20

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #33 on: July 12, 2016, 04:20:48 PM »

can we not send the bowlers back down the mines on a shift the night before a game ? and the canary.

'back in my day ayyeee 50 t'overs oophill in rain,snow, now't for toenails and boot like deep-sea diver was I, by eck'
Logged

chrisbd

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 213
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #34 on: July 12, 2016, 04:31:05 PM »

Surely what we will see is a longer middle now? As in far more of the edge will be 35mm, and more of the spine be 60mm - as opposed to a more swollen shape nowadays? Wouldn't that mean that more mishits lower down or higher up would still go for six?

Does that make sense?
Logged
Personal Account.

ppccopener

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7790
  • Trade Count: (+6)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #35 on: July 12, 2016, 04:35:52 PM »

to be serious I cant see where this is really going, bats have developed massively in the last few years.

I agree with the poster previously, let bats develop and do away with covers, all matches on uncovered wickets......

that would then be an even contest between bat and ball.....but we know the test matches are money-spinners, 5 days tests are the ideal for TV and sponsorship, and hospitality.

But I would love to see uncovered tracks.....
 :)
Logged

GoodLeave

Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #36 on: July 12, 2016, 05:28:53 PM »

"Sir, please do not bowl so fast. It's hurting my feelings"
Logged

Tom

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
  • Trade Count: (+33)
    • www.cricketinsight.co.uk
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #37 on: July 12, 2016, 05:44:11 PM »

Make a 35mm edge and a wider spine, which is 45mm and starts 2mm in from the edge
« Last Edit: July 12, 2016, 05:46:11 PM by Tom »
Logged

edge

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4876
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #38 on: July 12, 2016, 07:12:03 PM »

Make a 35mm edge and a wider spine, which is 45mm and starts 2mm in from the edge
Ha yes, some kind of GN Vortex/Slaz V1200 crossbreed, sorted!
Logged
HS: 156, BB: 7-20

rickjames

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5094
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #39 on: July 12, 2016, 07:25:22 PM »

Time to stock up on a Kaboom or two
Logged

ProCricketer1982

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7432
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #40 on: July 12, 2016, 07:38:38 PM »

Won't make a difference.


Wickets need to be sporting, boundaries bigger, use dukes in all cricket, no silly fielding circles and bring back the draw at amateur level as it'll reduce the need to smash every ball as bowling becomes important again, not just smashing runs
Logged

mace9960

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #41 on: July 12, 2016, 07:41:44 PM »

Ricky Ponting Has "Willow Envy"
Logged

Blank Bats

  • Forum Sponsor
  • International Captain
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1158
  • Trade Count: (+20)
    • Blank Bats
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #42 on: July 12, 2016, 07:53:45 PM »

I think rounder faces and fuller shapes will make a comeback.
More emphasis on the handle and pressing now.
Logged
Blank Bats
http://www.blankbats.co.uk
For more info email blankbats@gmail.com

mace9960

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #43 on: July 12, 2016, 08:05:39 PM »

So When The Bat Restrictions Don't Work And The Ball Continues To Fly Over The Boundary, Will They Then Look At The Real Issues Such As Switching To The Duke Ball Rather Than Bending Over For Kookaburra. Make The Use Of The Duke Ball Mandatory For Test Nations, Address Flat Pitches. Setting A Maximum Size For The Boundary According To And Depending On The Size Of The Stadium. If You Set The Boundary To 85+ metres You Could Gross Out Every Stadium In New Zealand, Half The Stadiums In The United Kingdom & Most In The Caribbean.
Logged

Sitonit

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 989
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Should bat regulations be updated?
« Reply #44 on: July 12, 2016, 08:08:58 PM »

https://twitter.com/theanalyst/status/752870660146335744

Amazing what the media can do


That's just one aspect but it would hardly have any effect if we are playing in a 60 yard boundary.

If not 85, then 80 meters boundary should be minimum.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
 

Advertise on CBF