That was my theory (on another thread), instead of taking average spinners (batty et al) which are fodder to Indian's brought up on spin. Why not take good quicks who can reverse it instead.
Because the only fast bowler to dominant in India in the last decade has been Steyn. Guys like Lee and Johnson have been smashed to pieces
Australian conspiracy theorist Tate035 is on one...The reason why New Zealand are playing three spinners is because their seam bowling all rounder Jimmy Neesham was injured in the nets yesterday and unable to play. Neesham would've played ahead of Mark Craig.There's nothing wrong with this pitch whatsoever, because if it was a square turner, then India would've played their leg spinner Mishra, but the opted for two quicks and two spinners. That said Ashwin and Jadeja are vastly superior to the Kiwis spinners
This is some comeback by the kiwi's. 7 down on a flat wicket. Some ball from boult!
It's all.about opinions. For me if ball is turning then reversing on the 1st day then "usually " the test match doesn't last 4 days...For me personally that is not test match cricket. I like to see bowlers and batsmen using their skills and NOT relying on the pitch to make them look good...
Remember frequently the best way to win a test match in India is to lose the toss, bowl, bowl the side out for 300, score 450 plus then skittle the other side in the 3rd innings.
This games been turned on it's head by the indian spinners! Hoping for some runs from the tail