Woakes is doing well - he has understood the weaknesses in his game at the top level and tried to address them. I never thought he would manage it, but he has got to the stage where - at least in England - he is test class.
But he is never going to win a game from nowhere by force of personality.
Flintoff did, Stokes has started to and will do so more.
I agree that Freddie's figures do him less justice than any other England bowlers of recent times (even more so than Anderson and Hoggard). His first twenty or so games, when he was very definitely a batsman who turned his arm over, perhaps distort the quality of what went afterward. As did the fact that his three peak years, which accounted for 40% of his Test career, came in a stellar attack in which he had to fight for wickets with Harmison and Jones' extreme wheels, Hoggard's supreme swing and, as daft as it sounds, Ashley Giles' ability to pick up wickets when batsmen sought to get going whilst the had the chance.
The guy was a beast. You mention "that" over but he bowled whole spells as good - I'd suggest any young bowler watch the way he destroyed the Aussies at the Oval in '05 - 12 staright overs of pace, movement, bounce and not a bad ball in sight.