Definitly benefitted initially from such a strong experienced line up- middle order of trott, kp, bell plus swann, broad, anderson at their peaks is going to help anyone.
I never got the impression he wanted or enjoyed the captaincy. Its not an easy job- all time greats of the game have tried and failed. For Cook to step into a role like that was for the good of the team and that deserves credit. His conservatism illustrated that hes not a natural at the role, hopefully root will bring more flare and natural instinct to the job.
I think he'll be remembered as a solid, if not imoressive captain who overall took the team on and helped to embed some future england stars and greats as the next generation. Having someone withnhis experience to bridge that gap may prove invaluable...
absolutely, but look at those names you mention.....quality players who could win games, look at Ponting, was it not Warne who said literally his grandma(must be in the genes) could captain the superb Aussie side in the late 90's and early 2000's.....?
Ponting has a great record as Captain, is he a great captain thou...not really. Mark Taylor did a lot with a more limited side IMHO.Steve Waugh? great leader-look at the players he had thou.
Cook has not hung on too long, he is now leaving a good period for someone new to settle in-sounds to me like a decision with the team in mind
As for Kevin Pieterson, views will be clouded, people can blame Cook all they like, and they will, he clashed with Flower not Cook(who KP actually respects massively if you have followed the saga)
Personally the 'divorce' while badly handed by the ECB was the best thing that could of happened to English cricket. The team moves on with younger players, and it has.
I don't expect others to agree and it's great there's different opinions on the forum, it's what makes it a good place.