Boycott at his insufferable worst yet again
Swann was correct that it probably wasn't a no-ball but he was wrong to act like it was an insanely terrible decision.
Boycott was wrong to say it wasn't a no-ball, but he was correct to say that bowler's should keep their foot behind the line. There's no excuse for not having at least half of your foot behind the line.
The real debate shouldn't be about that no-ball from Crane but why there isn't an umpire in the stands who watches the line every ball so bowlers know if they're overstepping on deliveries prior to wickets and reviews.