This pretty much sums it up for me. My instinct says he's a self serving (No Swearing Please) who could have been managed better but perhaps he's a decent bloke who got a raw deal, we'll likely never know.
I'd argue cricketers are all self-serving to a degree. You earn your next gig through runs and wickets...
Alec Stewart said he would only retire once he had a Test average of 40+ (possibly tongue in cheek), and he is seen as a belt and braces England hero. It's how you present yourself, I guess, and KP was very unEnglish in stating he wanted to be the best and very open in his selfishness. Thing is, he delivered the goods, and often in a coruscating and brilliant fashion - an average of 47 + nearly 62 runs per 100 balls is some record. His hundreds in Mumbai and Colombo in 2011/12 were almost transcendent.
Particularly the Colombo one -
http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/12588/scorecard/521226/sri-lanka-vs-england-2nd-test-england-tour-of-sri-lanka-2011-12/ Look at his strike rate relative to everyone else in the game, WOW.
But I'm with
@Bulldog Cricket - if I hear him say 'BEAUTIFUL CRICKET SHOT' again I'm going to huff and moan on a forum/Twitter. What a (successful) bellend.