Not really a test quality batter Been tried.. failed ...
Wade got told to go and score big runs by Justin Langer. Has been at the top of the sheffield shield runs most of the season and still not been picked. Elite Honesty A fair enough point except hes been replaced by Khawaja, Handscomb and the Marshes who you could say the same about. Particularly in England.
Nothing is sacred https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/47623980
Extremely non-bothered by this. That said... if we're going to have numbers in tests then it absolutely has to follow rugby's lead and be numbered 1-11 based on batting position, none of this Root 66 nonsense.
Extremely non-bothered by this. That said... if we're going to have numbers in tests then it absolutely has to follow rugby's lead and be numbered 1-11 based on batting position, none of this Root 66 nonsense.@liscon12 years back I played for a side in a local parks league, the first time we got proper team shirts they decided to go for names/numbers as well. Got asked what number I wanted, nothing mentioned about names... shirt arrived with my first name on it!
Players will be given the choice of any number between 0 and 99we may get Root 66 but at least there wont be Gayle 333 or Muralitharan 800 etc
It'll just be like the County Championship then I guess. I wonder if this will now pave the way for more clubs to start putting names and numbers on the backs of white shirts? (queue awful nicknames)
A journo made a good point on twitter about this.... that it may encourage a few more test white shirt sales, kids with Root 66 or Kohli 12 on their back, and that can only be a good thing.