the thing is - I don't have a problem with a trigger if it is done properly and adds something specific to your game. There are benefits to having one in some cases.
I just think that in most cases a trigger is introduced for the wrong reasons and that it is largely a modern fad in club cricketers and also the trigger is done incorrectly - perhaps taking you away from the correct position, done way to late (they should be done before the bowler enters his delivery stride, not during) and not allowing the batsman to keep their head still and eyes level.
People see loads of pro's with triggers and think that is what they should do. Against an 80mph bowler there is an argument to say a trigger could be helpful to get your feet moving and to get you on the balls of your feet and against a spinner a forward press is also a method that can work.
But almost all club cricketers face medium pace bowlers where 75mph is fast and 65 is normal. Against this type of bowling standing still and keeping your eyes still makes batting so much simpler and easier. Plus it allows your technique to be less complicated, so less can go wrong, you are starting in the correct position, so you know where your stumps are... I could rattle on for some time about the massive advantages of being side on, still and on the balls of your feet, but I think you get the message.