Bess had the wrong field because he kept bowling to full. How many times did he get nailed through the covers? I understand Bess is a project player but if he's totally ineffective on a wearing pitch what's the point of playing him?
Bess was robbed of a plumb LBW by "umpires call" and had a chance dropped because Stokes was too proactive in moving to anticipate a shot. He's 22 years old with bags of talent, there's no way he should be dropped after this game because he didn't take 11 wickets in the second innings. I'm honestly not sure who's worse, Ed Smith it the CBF selection panel...
So he wasn’t really robbed then he? There was doubt in the umpires mind as to where the ball struck the batsman...
You clearly didn't watch the Test, did you? The LBW in question pitched outside off, hit in line and was smashing into middle. Somehow this was umpires call on height (despite virtually the whole ball hitting the stumps according to Hawkeye..
51% of the ball has hit the stumps for it to be reversed, so according to Hawkeye it wasn’t.
50% has to be hitting, half the ball was easily hitting, that picture probably isn't big enough to show it, chase was dead there and got away with it
Can anyone explain how not out was the "correct decision" here? Genuinely baffled as it wasn't even just clipping. What percentage of the ball has to be hitting the stumps?
I may be pointing to stats a little too much but I'm not sure how you can't be sold on a lad with a FC average of 60 and just 8 tests under his belt already has an average of 41 at the age of 22. But each to their own, I guess.