It's been suggested to me that I should buy a spare bat for my son to use in the nets, to protect his match bat and make it last longer.
This led me to 2 questions.
1)
Is this worth it?
He's now using an adult SH bat, so no issues with him growing out of it. The match bat was £300, so it makes sense to try look after it. The bat maker who made the original (excellent) bat has offered to make a new one (at a lower grade) for £180. I know the wood difference is purely cosmetic, so it makes sense to economise here (to me). Or should he just keep using his "main" bat over the winter nets, with maybe a refurb?
2a)
Assuming we decide to buy a spare bat. It would make sense to me that I buy a bat as similar to his "main" bat as possible. By going back to the same maker with the same specifications as the original, then any net practise will replicate an in-match stroke as closely as possible. Is this a good idea? I can't see any reason why it is a bad idea- but maybe there is a reason.
2b)
If duplicating the main bat is a good idea, why do so many of you have so many different bats?
OK- slightly tongue in cheek, but given some of the huge attention to detail people seem to demand from bats, surely having 6 different bats from different manufacturers or models will work against using any of the bats consistently? If it doesn't, does that mean that the initial requirements are unnecessarily restrictive?