Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 43

Author Topic: ENG vs PAK -  (Read 45363 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SillyShilly

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2447
  • Trade Count: (+22)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #285 on: August 27, 2010, 10:02:46 AM »

Cooks gone, third ball of the day - what's peoples predictions for the rest of todays play then???
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #286 on: August 27, 2010, 10:05:53 AM »

England all out for 230
Logged

pumakid

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 895
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #287 on: August 27, 2010, 10:08:31 AM »

pietersen must be dropped!!!
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #288 on: August 27, 2010, 10:10:19 AM »

pietersen must be dropped!!!

as much as i dont like comments like this, im starting to think it might be for the best.

if only the pakistanis would drop him in the slips!
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #289 on: August 27, 2010, 10:11:30 AM »

Colly now in. Im watching online at work, so i have no sound. How many times have Sky called him "Brigadier Block" already?
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12679
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #290 on: August 27, 2010, 10:12:37 AM »

pietersen must be dropped!!!
That is a horrific idea, on that basis do you think Strauss should get dropped too, his series average is worse than KP's? Anyone can get out first ball, espcially in these condictions.

I am not sure Eng will make 150, 220 is a good score today... sunny this weekend so we could be in real trouble.
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #291 on: August 27, 2010, 10:15:02 AM »

Colly now gone! Maybe Ponting had a point about batting collapses
Logged

Johnny

  • Administrator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4566
  • Trade Count: (+9)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #292 on: August 27, 2010, 10:17:37 AM »

Oh Crap
Logged
Email - Johnny@CustomBats.co.uk
Twitter - www.twitter.com/CustomBatsForum
Facebook - www.facebook.com/CustomBatsForum

Cover_Drive

  • Moderator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5698
  • Trade Count: (+14)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #293 on: August 27, 2010, 10:18:41 AM »

Trott looking good out there
Logged
Twitter: @_UzairM

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #294 on: August 27, 2010, 10:19:58 AM »

That is a horrific idea, on that basis do you think Strauss should get dropped too, his series average is worse than KP's? Anyone can get out first ball, espcially in these condictions.

I am not sure Eng will make 150, 220 is a good score today... sunny this weekend so we could be in real trouble.

Good point. Strauss, Cook (bar his ton in the last game), Colly and KP are all in the same boat. I find it hard to distinguish one from the other batting average/performance wise this series. I bet Ian Bell is loving this

Big knock for Morgan, no time like the present to prove you can dig in and play a test match innings
Logged

peplow

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6791
  • Trade Count: (+77)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #295 on: August 27, 2010, 10:22:49 AM »

ohh no
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #296 on: August 27, 2010, 10:23:05 AM »

Deep poo now
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

peplow

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6791
  • Trade Count: (+77)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #297 on: August 27, 2010, 10:23:37 AM »

knee deep!
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #298 on: August 27, 2010, 10:24:01 AM »

I'll take the blame for that, think i cursed the lad!
Logged

Johnny

  • Administrator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4566
  • Trade Count: (+9)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #299 on: August 27, 2010, 10:24:23 AM »

From reading the BBC text commentary, it sounds like some pretty special bowling going on - though Pieterson sonds like he was trying to be a bit to aggressive first ball - Cook and Colly sound like they've been done by good'uns
Logged
Email - Johnny@CustomBats.co.uk
Twitter - www.twitter.com/CustomBatsForum
Facebook - www.facebook.com/CustomBatsForum
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 43
 

Advertise on CBF