Advertise on CBF

Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 43

Author Topic: ENG vs PAK -  (Read 45314 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

petehosk

  • Administrator
  • Forum Legend
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8815
  • Trade Count: (+39)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #405 on: August 31, 2010, 06:10:28 PM »

I can understand them changing keeper and giving Davies a try as he's on superb form.
But I tend to agree with the opinion here, that if you're playing Davies, then why play Kieswetter as well?
I would give Adams from Hampshire a go....I am biased as it's my place of birth....but the guy is on awesome form!
Logged

Watsontotty

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2454
  • Trade Count: (+11)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #406 on: August 31, 2010, 06:13:33 PM »

Pete, how he has been given a chance is a joke the lad looks a cracking player in great form but as always he may get a chance when he is struggling or a few of the current players ain't scoring he will get chucked in at the deep end for the odd game here or there.
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #407 on: August 31, 2010, 06:21:00 PM »

I agree with the prior comment. If you arent picking kieswetter to keep then for me Prior gets in as a keeper/batsmen. I would say this makes Davies almost odds on to go to Aus as Priors understudy.
Logged

Talisman

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 603
  • Trade Count: (+76)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #408 on: August 31, 2010, 07:09:52 PM »

The trouble with T20 is it is so hit and miss, and therefore the player selection can be as well. It only takes one player to have a great spell with the bat or ball to win the match, maybe with Lumb injured and KP rested they are looking to shore up the squad with an eye on the ODI World Cup.

I hate seeing players lauded and then dumped in a short space of time and since we are talking 7 months since he qualified for England would it not make sense to give Kieswetter a longer run in the ODI format.
Logged

PM7

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1165
  • Trade Count: (+7)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #409 on: August 31, 2010, 07:32:59 PM »

Always amazes me why the English selectors are so bold and brave in recent times?.Kieswetter is totally hit and miss, just qualified for England,had a few good scores yet is now selected purely as a batsman. Morgan played a few good knocks and is now a fully fledged Test match batsman?
I can see him being just 3 innings away from being dropped.

Maybe the new England is simply blessed with an abundance of talent which is a good problem to have.Caps are given away too easily these days, I prefer the old fashioned approach of proving yourself in county cricket over a few years and earning your place through hard graft and consistent scores.

Think of the quality of the Aussies that cant get into the team and yet give it 110% in their domestic league which is way ahead of county cricket in terms of competitiveness.Having said that England will win the Ashes all day long :)
Logged

iand123

  • Moderator
  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3918
  • Trade Count: (+13)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #410 on: August 31, 2010, 07:34:26 PM »

I hate seeing players lauded and then dumped in a short space of time and since we are talking 7 months since he qualified for England would it not make sense to give Kieswetter a longer run in the ODI format.

Completely agree, thought the ECB had moved on from this kind of selection policy
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12676
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #411 on: September 02, 2010, 09:06:14 AM »

Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #412 on: September 02, 2010, 08:28:55 PM »

The three players have been officially charged by the icc under the anti corruption law although they are saying will be investigated further but have now charged them so should be fun to see the pcb's response to this
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

Jeet

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1082
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #413 on: September 02, 2010, 08:56:04 PM »

The three players have been officially charged by the icc under the anti corruption law although they are saying will be investigated further but have now charged them so should be fun to see the pcb's response to this
Life bans must be dished out.
Logged
"Commit all your crimes when Sachin is batting", "They will go unnoticed because even the Lord is watching".

peplow

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6791
  • Trade Count: (+77)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #414 on: September 02, 2010, 08:57:16 PM »

and they MUST be actual life bans, none of this life = a month bans!
Logged

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #415 on: September 02, 2010, 08:58:46 PM »

That was pcb back tracking with bans I doubt icc will back track if found guilty
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

peplow

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6791
  • Trade Count: (+77)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #416 on: September 02, 2010, 09:00:17 PM »

yeah good, the pcb is a joke! Wonder what will happen to the guy in the video? majeed is it?
Logged

Buzz

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12676
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Clear your mind, stay still and watch the ball
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #417 on: September 02, 2010, 09:01:23 PM »

We don't know they are guilty yet - The News of the World has a history of setting people up (just ask a certain former England Rugby Captain...)

Plus life bans are far to harsh given the offence - I believe that this is on a par with drug cheeting, therefore a 2 year ban should be the maximum
 
Logged
"Bradman didn't used to have any trigger movements or anything like that. He turned batting into a subconscious act" Tony Shillinglaw.

roco

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6991
  • Trade Count: (+16)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #418 on: September 02, 2010, 09:02:46 PM »

Not much I think as the charge against him was defrauding book makers but the book makers are not in uk so could get complicated
Logged
The first cricket box was used in 1874.  The first cricket helmet was introduced in 1974. So, it took 100 years for men to twig that their brains were also worth protecting.

peplow

  • Forum Legend
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6791
  • Trade Count: (+77)
Re: ENG vs PAK -
« Reply #419 on: September 02, 2010, 09:11:08 PM »

gambling is illegal in pakistan anyway isnt it??
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 43
 

Advertise on CBF